Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

optimize: fix node-gyp build error on arm64 and macos #6745

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 13, 2024

Conversation

slievrly
Copy link
Member

  • I have registered the PR changes.

Ⅰ. Describe what this PR did

fix node-gyp build error on arm64 and macos

Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?

Ⅲ. Why don't you add test cases (unit test/integration test)?

Ⅳ. Describe how to verify it

Ⅴ. Special notes for reviews

Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 12, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 50.87%. Comparing base (880ef0f) to head (c41035b).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##                2.x    #6745      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     50.88%   50.87%   -0.02%     
+ Complexity     5917     5914       -3     
============================================
  Files          1058     1058              
  Lines         36772    36772              
  Branches       4368     4368              
============================================
- Hits          18712    18708       -4     
- Misses        16171    16174       +3     
- Partials       1889     1890       +1     

see 2 files with indirect coverage changes

Copy link
Contributor

@funky-eyes funky-eyes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@funky-eyes funky-eyes modified the milestones: 2.1.0, 2.2.0 Aug 13, 2024
@funky-eyes funky-eyes merged commit 1483250 into apache:2.x Aug 13, 2024
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants