Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PR 13757 follow-up: add missing with-discountOverlaps Similarity constructor variants, CHANGES.txt entries (#13845) #13891

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: branch_9_12
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

cpoerschke
Copy link
Contributor

(cherry picked from commit dab7311)

Resolved Conflicts:
lucene/CHANGES.txt

…tructor variants, CHANGES.txt entries (apache#13845)

(cherry picked from commit dab7311)

Resolved Conflicts:
	lucene/CHANGES.txt
@@ -47,6 +52,9 @@ API Changes
the entire segment should be scored. Subclasses that override the method should instead override its replacement.
(Luca Cavanna)

* GITHUB#13757: For similarities, provide default computeNorm implementation and remove remaining discountOverlaps setters.
(Christine Poerschke, Adrien Grand, Robert Muir)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am afraid is is now too late to modify the changelog for 9.12, as it's already been released?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, https://lucene.apache.org/core/9_12_0/changes/Changes.html cannot be modified but my understanding is that the addition of the missing entry here would be included in https://lucene.apache.org/core/9_12_1/changes/Changes.html in future then, with the 9.12.1 file including 9.12.0 and earlier content also. Whether or not that's worthwhile, hmm, subjective I guess.

Copy link

This PR has not had activity in the past 2 weeks, labeling it as stale. If the PR is waiting for review, notify the [email protected] list. Thank you for your contribution!

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Oct 29, 2024
@javanna
Copy link
Contributor

javanna commented Nov 5, 2024

@cpoerschke would you mind getting this in, but backing out the changes to 9.12.0 section of the change log?

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the Stale label Nov 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants