Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(core/bench): Add benchmark for concurrent write #3942

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 8, 2024
Merged

Conversation

Xuanwo
Copy link
Member

@Xuanwo Xuanwo commented Jan 8, 2024

This PR will add benchmark for concurrent write.

Seems cool!

service_oss_write_with_concurrent/1
                        time:   [1.3195 s 1.3575 s 1.3909 s]
                        thrpt:  [57.517 MiB/s 58.932 MiB/s 60.630 MiB/s]
service_oss_write_with_concurrent/2
                        time:   [754.59 ms 773.29 ms 795.32 ms]
                        thrpt:  [100.59 MiB/s 103.45 MiB/s 106.02 MiB/s]
service_oss_write_with_concurrent/4
                        time:   [453.25 ms 465.07 ms 476.84 ms]
                        thrpt:  [167.77 MiB/s 172.02 MiB/s 176.50 MiB/s]
service_oss_write_with_concurrent/8
                        time:   [276.45 ms 286.87 ms 300.81 ms]
                        thrpt:  [265.95 MiB/s 278.87 MiB/s 289.39 MiB/s]
Found 1 outliers among 10 measurements (10.00%)

Signed-off-by: Xuanwo <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Xuanwo <[email protected]>
@Xuanwo Xuanwo marked this pull request as draft January 8, 2024 09:06
@Xuanwo Xuanwo marked this pull request as ready for review January 8, 2024 09:22
Copy link
Member

@suyanhanx suyanhanx left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Incredible!

@Xuanwo Xuanwo merged commit 52b6f18 into main Jan 8, 2024
39 checks passed
@Xuanwo Xuanwo deleted the concurrent-bench branch January 8, 2024 10:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants