-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 472
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: add position write #4795
feat: add position write #4795
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Overall looks good to, thanks a lot!
/// PositionWriter will call this API when: | ||
/// | ||
/// - All the data has been written to the buffer and we can perform the upload at once. | ||
fn write_once(&self, body: Buffer) -> impl Future<Output = Result<()>> + MaybeSend; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I feel like PositionWrite
don't need write_once
anymore since it should be exactly the same with write_all_at(0, buf)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
fixed
fn write_all_at( | ||
&self, | ||
offset: u64, | ||
body: Buffer, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please use buf
instead of body
in API.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
fixed.
) -> impl Future<Output = Result<()>> + MaybeSend; | ||
} | ||
|
||
#[allow(dead_code)] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Those code should not be dead_code
since we have exposed them.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
fixed.
} | ||
|
||
async fn abort(&mut self) -> Result<()> { | ||
Ok(()) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We might consider adding a truncate
API to discard existing written data. Let's table this feature for future discussion. Would you like to create an issue for this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I created a new issue for this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Xuanwo Have any problem yet?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
Part #4526