-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[fix][broker] Fix write duplicate entries into the compacted ledger after RawReader reconnects #21081
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
coderzc
force-pushed
the
fix_comapcted_duplicate
branch
from
August 28, 2023 15:16
5d63494
to
be20d49
Compare
Technoboy-
reviewed
Aug 30, 2023
.topic(topic) | ||
.enableBatching(false) | ||
.messageRoutingMode(MessageRoutingMode.SinglePartition) | ||
.create(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Close the producer
coderzc
force-pushed
the
fix_comapcted_duplicate
branch
from
September 1, 2023 08:50
72399ab
to
c6dc10c
Compare
codelipenghui
approved these changes
Sep 1, 2023
Awaitility.await().untilAsserted(() -> { | ||
PersistentTopicInternalStats internalStats = admin.topics().getInternalStats(topic, false); | ||
// Compacted topic ledger should have same number of entry equals to number of unique key. | ||
Assert.assertEquals(expected.size(), internalStats.compactedLedger.entries); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggested change
Assert.assertEquals(expected.size(), internalStats.compactedLedger.entries); | |
Assert.assertEquals(internalStats.compactedLedger.entries, expected.size()); |
Technoboy-
approved these changes
Sep 3, 2023
Technoboy-
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 5, 2023
…fter RawReader reconnects (#21081)
4 tasks
coderzc
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 20, 2023
…fter RawReader reconnects (#21081)
coderzc
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 20, 2023
…fter RawReader reconnects (#21081)
4 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
area/broker
area/compaction
cherry-picked/branch-2.10
cherry-picked/branch-2.11
cherry-picked/branch-3.0
cherry-picked/branch-3.1
doc-not-needed
Your PR changes do not impact docs
ready-to-test
release/2.9.5
release/2.10.6
release/2.11.3
release/3.0.2
release/3.1.1
type/bug
The PR fixed a bug or issue reported a bug
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation
Currently, the compactor will write duplicate entries into the compacted ledger after RawReader reconnects on phase two.
Modifications
If the messageId read is less than or equal to lastCompactedMessageId then the entry is skipped.
Verifying this change
(Please pick either of the following options)
This change is a trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage.
(or)
This change is already covered by existing tests, such as (please describe tests).
(or)
This change added tests and can be verified as follows:
(example:)
Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:
If the box was checked, please highlight the changes
Documentation
doc
doc-required
doc-not-needed
doc-complete
Matching PR in forked repository
PR in forked repository: