Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[improve] [auto-recovery] [branch-3.1] Migrate the replication testing from BookKeeper to Pulsar. #21340

Merged

Conversation

horizonzy
Copy link
Member

@horizonzy horizonzy commented Oct 11, 2023

Motivation

cherry-pick #21188

Documentation

  • doc
  • doc-required
  • doc-not-needed
  • doc-complete

Matching PR in forked repository

PR in forked repository:

…eper to Pulsar. (apache#21188)

There is no testing for AutoRecovery replication in Pulsar's current test suite, and we need to cover it. So migrate the replication testing from BookKeeper to Pulsar.

(cherry picked from commit 9061d8b)
@github-actions github-actions bot added the doc-not-needed Your PR changes do not impact docs label Oct 11, 2023
@horizonzy
Copy link
Member Author

/pulsarbot rerun-failure-checks

@poorbarcode poorbarcode merged commit b38c563 into apache:branch-3.1 Oct 11, 2023
58 of 80 checks passed
nikhil-ctds pushed a commit to datastax/pulsar that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2023
…g from BookKeeper to Pulsar. (apache#21340)

There is no testing for AutoRecovery replication in Pulsar's current test suite, and we need to cover it. So migrate the replication testing from BookKeeper to Pulsar.
srinath-ctds pushed a commit to datastax/pulsar that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2023
…g from BookKeeper to Pulsar. (apache#21340)

There is no testing for AutoRecovery replication in Pulsar's current test suite, and we need to cover it. So migrate the replication testing from BookKeeper to Pulsar.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants