Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Minor]Fix typos in JavaStreamingContext #10424

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

[Minor]Fix typos in JavaStreamingContext #10424

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

zsxwing
Copy link
Member

@zsxwing zsxwing commented Dec 21, 2015

No description provided.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Dec 22, 2015

Test build #48138 has finished for PR 10424 at commit 215347a.

  • This patch fails PySpark unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@zsxwing
Copy link
Member Author

zsxwing commented Dec 22, 2015

retest this please

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Dec 22, 2015

Test build #48143 has finished for PR 10424 at commit 215347a.

  • This patch fails from timeout after a configured wait of 250m.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@holdenk
Copy link
Contributor

holdenk commented Dec 22, 2015

LGTM

@rxin
Copy link
Contributor

rxin commented Dec 22, 2015

I've merged this in master & branch-1.6.

@asfgit asfgit closed this in 93da856 Dec 22, 2015
asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 22, 2015
@zsxwing @rxin
[MINOR] Fix typos in JavaStreamingContext
309ef35 
Author: Shixiong Zhu <[email protected]>

Closes #10424 from zsxwing/typo.

(cherry picked from commit 93da856)
Signed-off-by: Reynold Xin <[email protected]>
@zsxwing zsxwing deleted the typo branch December 22, 2015 06:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@zsxwing @SparkQA @holdenk @rxin