Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[SPARK-35207][SQL] Normalize hash function behavior with negative zero (floating point types) #32496

Closed
wants to merge 6 commits into from
Closed

[SPARK-35207][SQL] Normalize hash function behavior with negative zero (floating point types) #32496

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
f86fba6
Changes implementation
planga82 May 11, 2021
641629d
Style corrections
planga82 May 12, 2021
a671ce7
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into feature/spark3520…
planga82 May 13, 2021
1de9c3d
Improve solution
planga82 May 13, 2021
869ae7c
Update migration guide
planga82 May 14, 2021
c123599
Simplify expressions
planga82 May 14, 2021
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
24 changes: 20 additions & 4 deletions sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/hash.scala
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -369,11 +369,25 @@ abstract class HashExpression[E] extends Expression {
protected def genHashBoolean(input: String, result: String): String =
genHashInt(s"$input ? 1 : 0", result)

protected def genHashFloat(input: String, result: String): String =
genHashInt(s"Float.floatToIntBits($input)", result)
protected def genHashFloat(input: String, result: String): String = {
s"""
|if($input == -0.0f) {
| ${genHashInt(s"Float.floatToIntBits(0.0f)", result)}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Although this has the semantic, shall we use simply "0" instead of s"Float.floatToIntBits(0.0f)"? We may add some comment for the semantic instead.

jshell> Float.floatToIntBits(0.0f)
$1 ==> 0

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You are right, I have tested it to be sure.
Murmur3HashFunction.hashInt(java.lang.Float.floatToIntBits(0.0f), 42) == Murmur3HashFunction.hashInt(0, 42)
It is simpler.

|} else {
| ${genHashInt(s"Float.floatToIntBits($input)", result)}
|}
""".stripMargin
}

protected def genHashDouble(input: String, result: String): String =
genHashLong(s"Double.doubleToLongBits($input)", result)
protected def genHashDouble(input: String, result: String): String = {
s"""
|if($input == -0.0d) {
| ${genHashLong(s"Double.doubleToLongBits(0.0d)", result)}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ditto. We had better use the simplest constant here instead of s"Double.doubleToLongBits(0.0d)".

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In this case, 0L?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The same as the previous point, thanks

|} else {
| ${genHashLong(s"Double.doubleToLongBits($input)", result)}
|}
""".stripMargin
}

protected def genHashDecimal(
ctx: CodegenContext,
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -523,7 +537,9 @@ abstract class InterpretedHashFunction {
case s: Short => hashInt(s, seed)
case i: Int => hashInt(i, seed)
case l: Long => hashLong(l, seed)
case f: Float if (f == -0.0f) => hashInt(java.lang.Float.floatToIntBits(0.0f), seed)
case f: Float => hashInt(java.lang.Float.floatToIntBits(f), seed)
case d: Double if (d == -0.0d) => hashLong(java.lang.Double.doubleToLongBits(0.0d), seed)
case d: Double => hashLong(java.lang.Double.doubleToLongBits(d), seed)
case d: Decimal =>
val precision = dataType.asInstanceOf[DecimalType].precision
Expand Down
11 changes: 11 additions & 0 deletions ...alyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/HashExpressionsSuite.scala
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -708,6 +708,17 @@ class HashExpressionsSuite extends SparkFunSuite with ExpressionEvalHelper {
checkEvaluation(HiveHash(Seq(yearMonth)), 1234)
}

test("SPARK-35207: Compute hash consistent between -0.0 and 0.0") {
def checkResult(exprs1: Expression, exprs2: Expression): Unit = {
checkEvaluation(Murmur3Hash(Seq(exprs1), 42), Murmur3Hash(Seq(exprs2), 42).eval())
checkEvaluation(XxHash64(Seq(exprs1), 42), XxHash64(Seq(exprs2), 42).eval())
checkEvaluation(HiveHash(Seq(exprs1)), HiveHash(Seq(exprs2)).eval())
}

checkResult(Literal.create(-0D, DoubleType), Literal.create(0D, DoubleType))
checkResult(Literal.create(-0F, FloatType), Literal.create(0F, FloatType))
}

private def testHash(inputSchema: StructType): Unit = {
val inputGenerator = RandomDataGenerator.forType(inputSchema, nullable = false).get
val toRow = RowEncoder(inputSchema).createSerializer()
Expand Down