Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Documentation: add description for repartitionAndSortWithinPartitions #3390

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

msiddalingaiah
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@sryza
Copy link
Contributor

sryza commented Nov 21, 2014

+1

<tr>
<td> <b>repartitionAndSortWithinPartitions</b>(<i>partitioner</i>) </td>
<td> Repartition the RDD according to the given partitioner and, within each resulting partition,
sort records by their keys. This is more efficient than calling <b>repartition</b> and then sorting within
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Mind replacing the <b> here with a <code> tag instead?

@msiddalingaiah
Copy link
Contributor Author

OK, done. Please review.

@JoshRosen
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM. Merging this into master and branch-1.2, since this feature is new in 1.2.0.

asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 1, 2014
Author: Madhu Siddalingaiah <[email protected]>

Closes #3390 from msiddalingaiah/master and squashes the following commits:

cbccbfe [Madhu Siddalingaiah] Documentation: replace <b> with <code> (again)
332f7a2 [Madhu Siddalingaiah] Documentation: replace <b> with <code>
cd2b05a [Madhu Siddalingaiah] Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master'
0fc12d7 [Madhu Siddalingaiah] Documentation: add description for repartitionAndSortWithinPartitions

(cherry picked from commit 2b233f5)
Signed-off-by: Josh Rosen <[email protected]>
@asfgit asfgit closed this in 2b233f5 Dec 1, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants