Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It seems a little suspicious to me that we assign to
receiverInfo
on this line only to remove the value that we set two lines later. I think it would be clearer to remove this line and change the next line to readlistenerBus.post(StreamingListenerReceiverStopped(newReceiverInfo))
instead.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The only difference with the above approach is that, the receiverInfo (at the ReceiverTracker) is not up-to-date (if we remove this line) at least with what is being sent to the StreamingListenerBus. Does the below approach make sense?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, that's essentially what I was proposing. I was suggesting
listenerBus.post(StreamingListenerReceiverStopped(newReceiverInfo)) receiverInfo.remove(streamId)
but I don't think there's going to be a huge different between this and your suggestion unless there are multi-threading concerns. Feel free to update this with your suggestion.