Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[SPARK-7429] [ml] Params cleanups #5960

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

jkbradley
Copy link
Member

Params.setDefault taking a set of ParamPairs should be annotated with varargs. I thought it would not work before, but it apparently does.

CrossValidator.transform should call transformSchema since the underlying Model might be a PipelineModel

CC: @mengxr

… varargs. I thought it would not work before, but it apparently does.

CrossValidator.transform should call transformSchema since the underlying Model might be a PipelineModel
@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Merged build triggered.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Merged build started.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented May 7, 2015

Test build #32067 has started for PR 5960 at commit 118b158.

@mengxr
Copy link
Contributor

mengxr commented May 7, 2015

first, others* is used to avoid overload ambiguity and empty args.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented May 7, 2015

Test build #32067 has finished for PR 5960 at commit 118b158.

  • This patch fails PySpark unit tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Merged build finished. Test FAILed.

@AmplabJenkins
Copy link

Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/32067/
Test FAILed.

@jkbradley
Copy link
Member Author

Waiting until [https://github.com//pull/5962] gets merged to test again

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented May 7, 2015

Test build #772 has started for PR 5960 at commit 118b158.

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented May 7, 2015

Test build #772 has finished for PR 5960 at commit 118b158.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@mengxr
Copy link
Contributor

mengxr commented May 7, 2015

LGTM. Merged into master and branch-1.4. Thanks!

asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 7, 2015
Params.setDefault taking a set of ParamPairs should be annotated with varargs. I thought it would not work before, but it apparently does.

CrossValidator.transform should call transformSchema since the underlying Model might be a PipelineModel

CC: mengxr

Author: Joseph K. Bradley <[email protected]>

Closes #5960 from jkbradley/params-cleanups and squashes the following commits:

118b158 [Joseph K. Bradley] Params.setDefault taking a set of ParamPairs should be annotated with varargs. I thought it would not work before, but it apparently does. CrossValidator.transform should call transformSchema since the underlying Model might be a PipelineModel

(cherry picked from commit 4f87e95)
Signed-off-by: Xiangrui Meng <[email protected]>
@asfgit asfgit closed this in 4f87e95 May 7, 2015
asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 9, 2015
In SPARK-7429 and PR #5960, I added the varargs annotation to Params.setDefault which takes a variable number of ParamPairs. It worked locally and on Jenkins for me.
However, mengxr reported issues compiling on his machine. So I'm reverting the change introduced in #5960 by removing varargs.

Author: Joseph K. Bradley <[email protected]>

Closes #6021 from jkbradley/revert-varargs and squashes the following commits:

098ed39 [Joseph K. Bradley] removed varargs annotation from Params.setDefaults taking multiple ParamPairs

(cherry picked from commit 2992623)
Signed-off-by: Xiangrui Meng <[email protected]>
asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 9, 2015
In SPARK-7429 and PR #5960, I added the varargs annotation to Params.setDefault which takes a variable number of ParamPairs. It worked locally and on Jenkins for me.
However, mengxr reported issues compiling on his machine. So I'm reverting the change introduced in #5960 by removing varargs.

Author: Joseph K. Bradley <[email protected]>

Closes #6021 from jkbradley/revert-varargs and squashes the following commits:

098ed39 [Joseph K. Bradley] removed varargs annotation from Params.setDefaults taking multiple ParamPairs
jeanlyn pushed a commit to jeanlyn/spark that referenced this pull request May 28, 2015
Params.setDefault taking a set of ParamPairs should be annotated with varargs. I thought it would not work before, but it apparently does.

CrossValidator.transform should call transformSchema since the underlying Model might be a PipelineModel

CC: mengxr

Author: Joseph K. Bradley <[email protected]>

Closes apache#5960 from jkbradley/params-cleanups and squashes the following commits:

118b158 [Joseph K. Bradley] Params.setDefault taking a set of ParamPairs should be annotated with varargs. I thought it would not work before, but it apparently does. CrossValidator.transform should call transformSchema since the underlying Model might be a PipelineModel
jeanlyn pushed a commit to jeanlyn/spark that referenced this pull request May 28, 2015
In SPARK-7429 and PR apache#5960, I added the varargs annotation to Params.setDefault which takes a variable number of ParamPairs. It worked locally and on Jenkins for me.
However, mengxr reported issues compiling on his machine. So I'm reverting the change introduced in apache#5960 by removing varargs.

Author: Joseph K. Bradley <[email protected]>

Closes apache#6021 from jkbradley/revert-varargs and squashes the following commits:

098ed39 [Joseph K. Bradley] removed varargs annotation from Params.setDefaults taking multiple ParamPairs
jeanlyn pushed a commit to jeanlyn/spark that referenced this pull request Jun 12, 2015
Params.setDefault taking a set of ParamPairs should be annotated with varargs. I thought it would not work before, but it apparently does.

CrossValidator.transform should call transformSchema since the underlying Model might be a PipelineModel

CC: mengxr

Author: Joseph K. Bradley <[email protected]>

Closes apache#5960 from jkbradley/params-cleanups and squashes the following commits:

118b158 [Joseph K. Bradley] Params.setDefault taking a set of ParamPairs should be annotated with varargs. I thought it would not work before, but it apparently does. CrossValidator.transform should call transformSchema since the underlying Model might be a PipelineModel
jeanlyn pushed a commit to jeanlyn/spark that referenced this pull request Jun 12, 2015
In SPARK-7429 and PR apache#5960, I added the varargs annotation to Params.setDefault which takes a variable number of ParamPairs. It worked locally and on Jenkins for me.
However, mengxr reported issues compiling on his machine. So I'm reverting the change introduced in apache#5960 by removing varargs.

Author: Joseph K. Bradley <[email protected]>

Closes apache#6021 from jkbradley/revert-varargs and squashes the following commits:

098ed39 [Joseph K. Bradley] removed varargs annotation from Params.setDefaults taking multiple ParamPairs
nemccarthy pushed a commit to nemccarthy/spark that referenced this pull request Jun 19, 2015
Params.setDefault taking a set of ParamPairs should be annotated with varargs. I thought it would not work before, but it apparently does.

CrossValidator.transform should call transformSchema since the underlying Model might be a PipelineModel

CC: mengxr

Author: Joseph K. Bradley <[email protected]>

Closes apache#5960 from jkbradley/params-cleanups and squashes the following commits:

118b158 [Joseph K. Bradley] Params.setDefault taking a set of ParamPairs should be annotated with varargs. I thought it would not work before, but it apparently does. CrossValidator.transform should call transformSchema since the underlying Model might be a PipelineModel
nemccarthy pushed a commit to nemccarthy/spark that referenced this pull request Jun 19, 2015
In SPARK-7429 and PR apache#5960, I added the varargs annotation to Params.setDefault which takes a variable number of ParamPairs. It worked locally and on Jenkins for me.
However, mengxr reported issues compiling on his machine. So I'm reverting the change introduced in apache#5960 by removing varargs.

Author: Joseph K. Bradley <[email protected]>

Closes apache#6021 from jkbradley/revert-varargs and squashes the following commits:

098ed39 [Joseph K. Bradley] removed varargs annotation from Params.setDefaults taking multiple ParamPairs
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants