Missing user in logs bug

[kdamichie]

This bug fix logs user when requests are made to Traffic_Ops when different authentication methods are used.

---

Which Traffic Control components are affected by this PR?

• Traffic Ops

What is the best way to verify this PR?

To test this change, you will need to test an API call to TO using 3 different authentication methods(mojolicious, access token, and bearer token).

• Login to TO and obtain mojolicious cookie and access token.
• Observe access.logs while making next requests
• Create request with mojolicious cookie.
  • Ex: curl -k --cookie "mojolicious=mojolicious cookie" -H "Content-Type: application/json" "your TO endpoint"
• Create request with access token.
  • Ex: curl -k --cookie "access_token=access token" -H "Content-Type: application/json" "your TO endpoint"
• Create request with access token.
  • Ex: curl -k --cookie "Authorization: Bearer access token" -H "Content-Type: application/json" "your TO endpoint"
• Ensure with each request that in access.logs logs the correct user you logged in with, and does not equal "-"

If this is a bugfix, which Traffic Control versions contained the bug?

Master

PR submission checklist

• This PR has tests
• This PR has documentation
• This PR has a CHANGELOG.md entry
• This PR DOES NOT FIX A SERIOUS SECURITY VULNERABILITY (see the Apache Software Foundation's security guidelines for details)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #7282 (1eb1f57) into master (0a30f45) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 28.57%.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master    #7282   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     26.11%   26.11%           
  Complexity       98       98           
=========================================
  Files           648      648           
  Lines         76057    76080   +23     
  Branches         90       90           
=========================================
+ Hits          19862    19872   +10     
- Misses        54362    54373   +11     
- Partials       1833     1835    +2     

Flag	Coverage Δ
golib_unit	53.01% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
grove_unit	4.60% <ø> (ø)
t3c_unit	5.32% <ø> (ø)
traffic_monitor_unit	20.43% <ø> (ø)
traffic_ops_integration	69.34% <ø> (ø)
traffic_ops_unit	19.69% <28.57%> (+0.01%)	⬆️
traffic_stats_unit	10.41% <ø> (ø)
unit_tests	22.55% <28.57%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️
v3	57.79% <ø> (ø)
v4	79.09% <ø> (ø)
v5	78.53% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
lib/go-rfc/http.go	34.09% <ø> (ø)
traffic_ops/traffic_ops_golang/tocookie/cookie.go	61.81% <ø> (+5.45%)	⬆️
.../traffic_ops_golang/routing/middleware/wrappers.go	62.50% <28.57%> (-3.31%)	⬇️
lib/go-atscfg/serverunknown.go	77.96% <0.00%> (-1.70%)	⬇️

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

[srijeet0406]

Code looks great! All automated tests pass.
Manual verification passed as well.