[Onnx] Pow support for other types #8933
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
AndrewZhaoLuo
requested review from
areusch,
comaniac,
Huyuwei,
jroesch,
junrushao,
jwfromm,
kazum,
mbrookhart,
merrymercy,
siju-samuel,
srkreddy1238,
tqchen and
yzhliu
as code owners
masahi
approved these changes
Sep 8, 2021
ylc
pushed a commit
to ylc/tvm
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 29, 2021
* update pow * update pow * remove duplicate Co-authored-by: Andrew Zhao Luo <[email protected]>
ylc
pushed a commit
to ylc/tvm
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 13, 2022
* update pow * update pow * remove duplicate Co-authored-by: Andrew Zhao Luo <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This updates the onnx spec for pow up to the latest opset. This includes mixing types and having integer pow().
We handle all of this by casting to float since codegen does not support an intrinsic pow operator. It might be worth it to come up with a good default implementation in relay for integer pow but I do not know if this is going to be faster than simply casting.