-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 40
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Reworked assignment search #366
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
.../src/main/scala/at/forsyte/apalache/tla/assignments/SmtFreeSymbolicTransitionExtractor.scala
Show resolved
Hide resolved
.../src/main/scala/at/forsyte/apalache/tla/assignments/SmtFreeSymbolicTransitionExtractor.scala
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
.../src/main/scala/at/forsyte/apalache/tla/assignments/SmtFreeSymbolicTransitionExtractor.scala
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That looks just great! The code is much simpler to follow than the SMT solution. Let's merge and play with this new implementation of assignments!
closes #348
closes #354 (together with #364)
As this approach to assignments makes cover analysis irrelevant, this PR implicitly closes/invalidates the following:
issues: #279, #298, #353, #111
open pr: #308
Potentially resolves issue #346: Under this build, the solver returns to expected behavior (EXITCODE: OK), but finds a deadlock in the listed specification. Author clarification required to close.
See also: #62