Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test snapshot packages for v0.9.2 #1588

Closed
amarthadan opened this issue Dec 5, 2022 · 5 comments
Closed

Test snapshot packages for v0.9.2 #1588

amarthadan opened this issue Dec 5, 2022 · 5 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@amarthadan
Copy link
Contributor

Prior to the v0.9.2 release, the snapshot packages and corresponding Docker images need to be tested.

NPM packages:

Docker images:

api3/airnode-deployer-dev:snapshot-v0.9.2
api3/airnode-client-dev:snapshot-v0.9.2
api3/airnode-admin-dev:snapshot-v0.9.2
@martinkolenic
Copy link
Contributor

martinkolenic commented Dec 7, 2022

Hi, I've run several testing scenarios to test the packages and images. This is good to go.

1: Deploy and remove Airnode (Docker, npm) - PASS
Steps: I deployed (using the Docker image) and removed (using the npm package) Airnode with the coingecko-signed-data example. I then ran a POST request to the gateway to check that functionality.
Expected result: Successful deployment and meaningful POST request response
Screenshots (I'd been switching between branches to get the correct configs generated by example scripts but the versions used are correct, I double checked):
Actual result: Matches the expected result
Screenshot:
Image
Image
Image

2: Test admin (Docker, npm) - PASS
Steps: I tested mnemonic generation in both the npm package and the Docker image.
Expected result: Successful command execution
Actual result: Matches the expected result
Screenshot:
Image

3: Test validator (npm) - PASS
Steps: Run it against a valid and invalid config file
Expected result: Confirm the (in)validity of the config files
Actual result: Matches expected result
Note: In the screenshot, you can see I used nano to remove a line from the config file to invalidate it.
Screenshot:
Image

@Siegrift
Copy link
Contributor

Siegrift commented Dec 8, 2022

Thanks @martinkolenic , @amarthadan I believe we can finish the release.

@Siegrift
Copy link
Contributor

Siegrift commented Dec 8, 2022

Actually, we should still wait for @metobom testing the faulty provider issue #1581 (comment)

@metobom any updates on this?

@Siegrift
Copy link
Contributor

Siegrift commented Dec 8, 2022

Actually, @martinkolenic tested the 0.9.2 as well #1565 (comment) so we could proceed even without @metobom confirmation (but not sure we want to).

@metobom
Copy link
Member

metobom commented Dec 8, 2022

Airnode v0.9.1
airnode91
Airnode v0.9.2
airnode92

No problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants