Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Investigate coordinator failure for faulty provider #1581

Closed
Siegrift opened this issue Dec 1, 2022 · 6 comments · Fixed by #1582
Closed

Investigate coordinator failure for faulty provider #1581

Siegrift opened this issue Dec 1, 2022 · 6 comments · Fixed by #1582
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@Siegrift
Copy link
Contributor

Siegrift commented Dec 1, 2022

https://api3workspace.slack.com/archives/C02AYRX8D89/p1669812538505089?thread_ts=1669715564.101439&cid=C02AYRX8D89

@Siegrift Siegrift closed this as completed Dec 1, 2022
@amarthadan amarthadan assigned martinkolenic and unassigned Siegrift Dec 1, 2022
@martinkolenic
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @Siegrift, I'm not sure how to test this specific case, could you please advise? I understand I'd need a faulty provider but where to find/mock one?

@bbenligiray
Copy link
Member

@metobom is periodically trying to reproduce the issue using 0.9.1 and the problematic provider. When he does, he will check if 0.9.2 still causes the same issue. Maybe skip testing this one.

@amarthadan
Copy link
Contributor

@metobom You can use the v0.9.2 snapshot packages/Docker images to test it.
#1588

@martinkolenic
Copy link
Contributor

martinkolenic commented Dec 7, 2022

Hi @Siegrift, I've tested the issue.

Steps: Deploy Airnode with a faulty provider URL (a Beeceptor URL with a 1000s delay before a response)
Expected result: Coordinator keeps functioning but displays an error message
Actual result: Matches expected result

Image

I retested this now as I wiped earlier logs by mistake.

@Siegrift
Copy link
Contributor Author

Siegrift commented Dec 8, 2022

@metobom is periodically trying to reproduce the issue using 0.9.1 and the problematic provider. When he does, he will check if 0.9.2 still causes the same issue. Maybe skip testing this one.

@bbenligiray Just to clarify, I asked Martin to test this on master and leave the 0.9.2 for @metobom. Thanks @martinkolenic, this can be moved to DONE.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants