Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix error when visiting __type fields #5016

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 1, 2023

Conversation

mayrn-techdivision
Copy link
Contributor

@mayrn-techdivision mayrn-techdivision commented Feb 1, 2023

🚨 IMPORTANT: Please do not create a Pull Request without creating an issue first.

Any change needs to be discussed before proceeding. Failure to do so may result in the rejection of the pull request.

Description

This fixes an issue with introspection queries that affects other guild projects when using @envelop/response-cache

Related #5015

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

How Has This Been Tested?

I've added a test case for the visitResult function that fails currently and passes after the changes

  • Test A (fails): yarn test visitResult on the first commit (772861f357fe3fcfbb7aa413ac479b50ef41a359)
  • Test B (passes): yarn test visitResult on the second commit (07ae1a1179004146909ae6cf2b500a82f48e3a0a)

Test Environment:

  • OS: Linux (codespaces container)
  • @graphql-tools/utils: 9.1.4
  • NodeJS: 14.x

Checklist:

  • I have followed the CONTRIBUTING doc and the style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests and linter rules pass locally with my changes
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

Further comments

If this is a relatively large or complex change, kick off the discussion by explaining why you chose the solution you did and what alternatives you considered, etc...

@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Feb 1, 2023

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: 4d86b5c

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

This PR includes changesets to release 34 packages
Name Type
@graphql-tools/utils Patch
@graphql-tools/batch-delegate Patch
@graphql-tools/batch-execute Patch
@graphql-tools/delegate Patch
@graphql-tools/executor Patch
@graphql-tools/graphql-tag-pluck Patch
@graphql-tools/import Patch
@graphql-tools/links Patch
@graphql-tools/load Patch
@graphql-tools/merge Patch
@graphql-tools/mock Patch
@graphql-tools/node-require Patch
@graphql-tools/relay-operation-optimizer Patch
@graphql-tools/resolvers-composition Patch
@graphql-tools/schema Patch
@graphql-tools/stitch Patch
@graphql-tools/stitching-directives Patch
@graphql-tools/wrap Patch
@graphql-tools/apollo-engine-loader Patch
@graphql-tools/code-file-loader Patch
@graphql-tools/git-loader Patch
@graphql-tools/github-loader Patch
@graphql-tools/graphql-file-loader Patch
@graphql-tools/json-file-loader Patch
@graphql-tools/module-loader Patch
@graphql-tools/prisma-loader Patch
@graphql-tools/url-loader Patch
@graphql-tools/executor-apollo-link Patch
@graphql-tools/executor-graphql-ws Patch
@graphql-tools/executor-http Patch
@graphql-tools/executor-legacy-ws Patch
@graphql-tools/executor-urql-exchange Patch
graphql-tools Patch
federation-benchmark Patch

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

@n1ru4l n1ru4l requested a review from ardatan February 1, 2023 14:09
@ardatan
Copy link
Owner

ardatan commented Feb 1, 2023

Thanks @mayrn-techdivision !

@ardatan ardatan merged commit 62d074b into ardatan:master Feb 1, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants