feat(anta): Added the test case to verify multiple routes with only specific nodes as next-hops #835
Conversation
|
This pull request has conflicts, please resolve those before we can evaluate the pull request. |
vitthalmagadum
force-pushed
the
issue_819
branch
from
ff97c98
to
8104c91
Compare
|
Conflicts have been resolved. A maintainer will review the pull request shortly. |
CodSpeed Performance ReportMerging #835 will not alter performanceComparing Summary
|
|
| name = "VerifyRouteEntry" | ||
| description = "Verifies the route entry(s) for the provided IPv4 Network(s)." | ||
| categories: ClassVar[list[str]] = ["routing"] | ||
| commands: ClassVar[list[AntaCommand | AntaTemplate]] = [AntaTemplate(template="show ip route {prefix}", revision=4)] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
we can give the vrf information into command so that will again help to reduce the output if a network is configure with another vrf
| ], | ||
| "inputs": { | ||
| "route_entries": [ | ||
| {"prefix": "10.10.0.1/32", "vrf": "default", "strict": True, "nexthops": ["10.100.0.8", "10.100.0.10", "10.100.0.11"]}, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
add the unit tests where strict is false
| "{'10.10.0.1/32': {'default': 'Expected only `10.100.0.8, 10.100.0.10, 10.100.0.11` nexthops should be listed but " | ||
| "found `10.100.0.8, 10.100.0.10` instead.'}, '10.100.0.128/31': {'MGMT': 'Expected only `10.100.0.8, 10.100.0.10, " | ||
| "10.100.0.11` nexthops should be listed but found `10.100.0.8, 10.100.0.10` instead.'}}" | ||
| ], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
add the unit test where strict is true and length of actual and expected nexthop is also same but the addresses are not same.
Description
Verifies the route entries of given IPv4 network(s).
Fixes #819
Checklist:
pre-commit run)tox -e testenv)