Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NodeHasPkgCountTest.java:41-42: Test methods for... #310

Closed
0pdd opened this issue Jul 2, 2020 · 12 comments · Fixed by #499
Closed

NodeHasPkgCountTest.java:41-42: Test methods for... #310

0pdd opened this issue Jul 2, 2020 · 12 comments · Fixed by #499
Assignees

Comments

@0pdd
Copy link

0pdd commented Jul 2, 2020

The puzzle 307-d58d9aca from #307 has to be resolved:

* @todo #307:30min Test methods for description verification fail on windows: figure out why,
* fix it and remove disable annotation.

The puzzle was created by @olenagerasimova on 30-Jun-20.

Estimate: 30 minutes, role: DEV.

If you have any technical questions, don't ask me, submit new tickets instead. The task will be "done" when the problem is fixed and the text of the puzzle is removed from the source code. Here is more about PDD and about me.

@0crat
Copy link

0crat commented Jul 2, 2020

@g4s8/z, @olenagerasimova/z please, pay attention to this issue

@olenagerasimova
Copy link
Member

@0crat in

@0crat
Copy link

0crat commented Jul 3, 2020

The job #310 assigned to @victornoel/z, here is why; the budget is 30 minutes, see §4; please, read §8 and §9; if the task is not clear, read this and this; there will be a monetary reward for this job

@victornoel
Copy link
Contributor

@0crat refuse I'm not on windows

@0crat
Copy link

0crat commented Jul 3, 2020

@0crat refuse I'm not on windows (here)

@victornoel The user @victornoel/z resigned from #310, please stop working. Reason for job resignation: Order was cancelled

@0crat
Copy link

0crat commented Jul 3, 2020

@0crat refuse I'm not on windows (here)

@victornoel Job refused in 1 hours - no penalty, see §6

@0crat
Copy link

0crat commented Jul 3, 2020

The job #310 assigned to @paulodamaso/z, here is why; the budget is 30 minutes, see §4; please, read §8 and §9; if the task is not clear, read this and this; there will be a monetary reward for this job

@0crat
Copy link

0crat commented Jul 8, 2020

@paulodamaso/z this job was assigned to you 5days ago. It will be taken away from you soon, unless you close it, see §8. Read this and this, please.

@paulodamaso
Copy link
Contributor

@0crat refuse

@0crat
Copy link

0crat commented Aug 7, 2020

@0crat refuse (here)

@paulodamaso The user @paulodamaso/z resigned from #310, please stop working. Reason for job resignation: Order was cancelled

@baudoliver7
Copy link
Member

@artipie/maintainers could I fix this ?

@olenagerasimova
Copy link
Member

@baudoliver7 yes, please

baudoliver7 referenced this issue in baudoliver7/rpm-adapter Dec 30, 2021
We figured out that `Mismatches` (`cactoos:0.18`) failed to match on Windows
because line sperator used in excepted mismatch description contained
unix separator while actual description contained windows separator.
So, we bumped cactoos to version `0.25` and updated all matchers impacted by
what's new in the new version.

Fix: #310
baudoliver7 referenced this issue in baudoliver7/rpm-adapter Dec 30, 2021
We figured out that `Mismatches` (`cactoos-matchers:0.18`) failed to match on Windows
because line seperator used in excepted mismatch description contained
Unix separator while actual description contained Windows separator.
So, we bumped `cactoos-matchers` to version `0.25` and updated all matchers impacted by what's new in the new version.

Fix: #310
olenagerasimova pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jan 10, 2022
We figured out that `Mismatches` (`cactoos-matchers:0.18`) failed to match on Windows
because line seperator used in excepted mismatch description contained
Unix separator while actual description contained Windows separator.
So, we bumped `cactoos-matchers` to version `0.25` and updated all matchers impacted by what's new in the new version.

Fix: #310
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

6 participants