Profile name override

[jlaneve]

Description

This PR allows a user to specify a profile_name_override. When specified, the profile Cosmos generates will be called the value passed.

Related Issue(s)

closes #266

Breaking Change?

Checklist

• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation (if required)
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works

[netlify]

👷 Deploy Preview for amazing-pothos-a3bca0 processing.

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	86b817e
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/amazing-pothos-a3bca0/deploys/647f6a6bf3882900084f4425

[netlify]

👷 Deploy Preview for amazing-pothos-a3bca0 processing.

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	626aa1c
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/amazing-pothos-a3bca0/deploys/648219ecc336b7000848b08a

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 100.00% and project coverage change: +0.41 🎉

Comparison is base (4e38f7b) 88.43% compared to head (626aa1c) 88.85%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #314      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   88.43%   88.85%   +0.41%     
==========================================
  Files          41       41              
  Lines        1280     1292      +12     
==========================================
+ Hits         1132     1148      +16     
+ Misses        148      144       -4     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
cosmos/providers/dbt/constants.py	100.00% <100.00%> (+100.00%)	⬆️
cosmos/providers/dbt/core/operators/local.py	80.34% <100.00%> (+1.16%)	⬆️
cosmos/providers/dbt/dag.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
cosmos/providers/dbt/render.py	92.78% <100.00%> (+0.07%)	⬆️
cosmos/providers/dbt/task_group.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[tatiana]

@jlaneve thanks. I left some minor comments inline!
Would this change also make sense in other execution modes (e.g. Docker and K8s)?
What happens, ATM, if the user passes this parameter to the DAG and the user is using one of these alternative execution modes?

[jlaneve]

@tatiana ready for re-review! I addressed all your comments. This doesn't make sense to include for Docker and Kubernetes, since we don't do any profile mapping for those. If you pass in this parameter with those arguments, the DAG won't parse and it'll give you a clear error:

[tatiana]

Thanks a lot, @jlaneve!