Fix outdated import statement #454
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Before 1.0 this was valid:
from cosmos.task_group import DbtTaskGroup
Now we expect users to do:
from cosmos import DbtTaskGroup
👷 Deploy Preview for amazing-pothos-a3bca0 processing.
|
Codecov ReportPatch and project coverage have no change.
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #454 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 90.12% 90.12%
=======================================
Files 50 50
Lines 1752 1752
=======================================
Hits 1579 1579
Misses 173 173 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
harels
approved these changes
Aug 10, 2023
tatiana
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 10, 2023
Before 1.0 this was valid:
```
from cosmos.task_group import DbtTaskGroup
```
Now we expect users to do:
```
from cosmos import DbtTaskGroup
```
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Before 1.0 this was valid:
Now we expect users to do: