Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: add champions concept #638

Merged
merged 18 commits into from
Feb 28, 2022
Merged

Conversation

jonaslagoni
Copy link
Member

Description
This PR introduces the champion concept.

Related issue(s)
Related discussion: #487

@jonaslagoni jonaslagoni changed the title docs: introducing champions concept docs: add champions concept Feb 14, 2022
@jonaslagoni jonaslagoni marked this pull request as ready for review February 14, 2022 19:24
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Feb 14, 2022

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 1910657268

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 93.431%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 1854331973: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 2526
Relevant Lines: 2577

💛 - Coveralls

CODEOWNERS Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@magicmatatjahu magicmatatjahu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am not an expert in English but I gave some comments 😅 I like the idea and I am for it!

README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
package.json Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/champions.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/champions.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@jonaslagoni
Copy link
Member Author

jonaslagoni commented Feb 17, 2022

@alequetzalli if you have time I would love to hear your opinion on this 🙂

magicmatatjahu
magicmatatjahu previously approved these changes Feb 18, 2022
Copy link
Member

@magicmatatjahu magicmatatjahu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, but Alejandra should look at this :)

README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@quetzalliwrites quetzalliwrites left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, just had 1 suggestion ✨✨

Co-authored-by: Alejandra Quetzalli  <[email protected]>
magicmatatjahu
magicmatatjahu previously approved these changes Feb 28, 2022
Copy link
Member

@magicmatatjahu magicmatatjahu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM but I have only one comment, please refer to it before merge :)

README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@magicmatatjahu magicmatatjahu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Feb 28, 2022

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@jonaslagoni
Copy link
Member Author

/rtm

@jonaslagoni jonaslagoni merged commit a88d0bf into asyncapi:master Feb 28, 2022
@jonaslagoni jonaslagoni deleted the feature/champions branch February 28, 2022 14:22
@asyncapi-bot
Copy link
Contributor

🎉 This PR is included in version 0.50.0 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

@asyncapi-bot
Copy link
Contributor

🎉 This PR is included in version 1.0.0-next.23 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants