Welcome to OpenUSD-proposals, a forum for sharing and collaborating on proposals for the advancement of USD.
Before getting started, please familiarize yourself with the contents of the Supplemental Terms page.
If you are interested in browsing existing proposals, please proceed right to the current list of proposals, with status information.
- a new schema, such as "Level of Detail for Games"
- an outline for a technical action, such as "Removing the usage of boost preprocessor macros"
- a new development, such as "Evaluation of Hermite Patches"
- a discussion of scope tightening, such as "Standardizing Alembic without HDF5"
For inspiration, here are several proposals that have previously been worked through: https://openusd.org/release/wp.html
Initial discussion and coordination of effort may occur in face-to-face meetings, the AOUSD forum, the Academy Software Foundation's wg-usd Slack channels, and other venues.
When a proposal has taken enough shape that it warrants detailed feedback and iteration, this repository exists as a place to work together on artifacts such as white papers, sample schema definitions, and so on.
- Fork this repo.
- Create a directory within
proposals/
for the proposal and its materials, and a README.md.- The README.md document may contain the proposal, or at a minimum, it should announce the contents of the proposal and how to understand the materials within the proposal.
- The README.md should also contain notes the author considers important for anyone looking at the proposal, which could include notes that a proposal has been superseded by another, that the proposal resulted in a change to another project, and so on.
- Submit a PR and fill out the provided sections in the pull request body.
- The PR may include links to supporting materials that could not be included with the proposal files, such as white papers. Add links to the "Supporting Materials" section of the PR body.
- Please mention and link any issues and PRs in OpenUSD or OpenUSD-proposals that are related to the new proposal. A label will be created to link relevant discussions together.
When writing and submitting a proposal, we make the following suggestions for receiving the best feedback.
-
Include a link to the rendered proposal in your PR description. This can be as simple as linking to the markdown file in your source branch.
This makes it significantly easier for someone to read the document in a well formatted way.
-
Your PR and proposal should include, and ideally start with, a short summary of what your change would achieve.
A possible structure could be:
- Summary of what you're hoping to achieve
- A problem statement explaining why what you are proposing is not currently possible
- A glossary of terms that readers may not be familiar with.
- If applicable, any links to existing implementations or reference documents that may be useful
- Details about your proposal, such as why you are making certain choices
- Risks that you anticipate (if any)
- Alternate solutions that you have considered (if any), and why you didn't go with them
- Any excluded topics, that you have left out and why. These may be things you want to handle separately in the future for example.
-
It is highly recommended that any submitted proposal include text examples of what your proposal would look like in
.usda
syntax. -
It's recommended that long sentences be split over multiple lines in your Markdown file. This allows more granular feedback, and easier viewing of the files.
Some proposals are inherently of significant size. In those case it is recommended to do one or both of the following:
-
Split your proposal into multiple smaller proposals.
- Create a sub-proposal PR per major feature.
- Create an umbrella proposal that links to each sub-proposal, ordered by their priority and dependency on each other.
-
Divide your proposal into smaller sections. These can be sections within the same document or separate documents.
This helps make each section easier to digest and provide feedback on.
A typical workflow for the proposal PR will have some initial discussion on the PR itself. Once some level of consensus has been reached on the proposal details, the PR may be landed. Iteration of the proposal may proceed via subsequent PRs, discussions in the corresponding issue, or using other tools available in github's interface.
New issues and PRs related to the proposal should be linked to the initial proposal by autolinking the original proposal PR (eg, #1234).
At any point, proposal text may be used in other contexts. For example, a proposal may be referenced when writing new schemas or code for USD. Referencing a proposal in this way does not guarantee that the proposal will advance beyond a discussion stage.
When a proposal has been approved as a starting point for implementation, that should be noted here with an updated proposal status (see section below). Subsequent development should occur in the appropriate forums. For example, if a proposal has been developed into code and concrete schemas, that might become a pull request against the main OpenUSD repo. Such a development should be noted in the proposal's README.md file and linked to the pull request in the main OpenUSD repo.
There are five proposal statuses:
- To do - This item hasn't been started
- Draft - Proposal is work-in-progress, but open for feedback and reviews
- Published - Proposal is approved to use as a starting point for implementation
- Implemented - Proposal has been implemented
- Hold - Proposal is not being worked on
You can monitor your proposal status using the OpenUSD Proposals Status page
New PRs are automatically given the To do status. This indicates the proposal is still in an early draft that is not yet ready for discussion/comments.
When the proposal is changed to the Draft status, this indicates the proposal is ready to be reviewed and discussed; however it is still work-in-progress and may continue to be updated.
Once a proposal is complete and fully reviewed, it will be merged and can be moved to Published status. This indicates the proposal can be used as a starting point for implementation. Any changes to the proposal at this point would need to be filed as a new PR.
Once implementation work has been completed, the proposal will be moved to Implemented status, with indication of which version of USD the proposal was implemented in.
The success of the forum is predicated on involvement and communication, so consider this an appeal to everyone's creativity and thoughtful consideration.
Civility, inclusiveness, friendship, and constructive collaboration shall be the hallmarks of this forum.
Thank you for your participation!