Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(route_handler): deal with completely overlapped inverted lane #1901

Merged

Conversation

takayuki5168
Copy link
Contributor

@takayuki5168 takayuki5168 commented Sep 16, 2022

Signed-off-by: Takayuki Murooka [email protected]

Description

support the completely overlapped inverted lane.
Without this PR, the route handler will have infinity loop process in the case with completely overlapped inverted lane
(get right bound of inverted lane -> get left bound of inverted lane -> get right bound of inverted lane -> ...)

image

Pre-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below when creating the PR.

In-review checklist for the PR reviewers

The PR reviewers must check the checkboxes below before approval.

Post-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below before merging.

  • There are no open discussions or they are tracked via tickets.

After all checkboxes are checked, anyone who has write access can merge the PR.

@takayuki5168 takayuki5168 marked this pull request as ready for review September 16, 2022 11:10
@takayuki5168
Copy link
Contributor Author

@zulfaqar-azmi-t4 Could you review this.

Copy link
Contributor

@rej55 rej55 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@takayuki5168
Copy link
Contributor Author

takayuki5168 commented Sep 16, 2022

I confirmed that the non-overlaped inverted lane was successfully calculated with this PR.
image

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 16, 2022

Codecov Report

Base: 10.44% // Head: 10.41% // Decreases project coverage by -0.03% ⚠️

Coverage data is based on head (b1e0ff5) compared to base (93cc9bd).
Patch coverage: 0.00% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1901      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   10.44%   10.41%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files        1233     1233              
  Lines       88034    88334     +300     
  Branches    20501    20722     +221     
==========================================
  Hits         9197     9197              
- Misses      69328    69614     +286     
- Partials     9509     9523      +14     
Flag Coverage Δ *Carryforward flag
differential 2.48% <0.00%> (?)
total 10.43% <0.00%> (ø) Carriedforward from 93cc9bd

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
planning/route_handler/src/route_handler.cpp 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...th_planner/src/scene_module/utils/path_shifter.cpp 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
.../src/scene_module/side_shift/side_shift_module.cpp 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...r_path_planner/scene_module/utils/path_shifter.hpp 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@takayuki5168 takayuki5168 merged commit 8e92d17 into autowarefoundation:main Sep 16, 2022
@takayuki5168 takayuki5168 deleted the fix/overlapped-inverted-lane branch September 16, 2022 12:37
boyali pushed a commit to boyali/autoware.universe that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2022
boyali pushed a commit to boyali/autoware.universe that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2022
boyali pushed a commit to boyali/autoware.universe that referenced this pull request Oct 3, 2022
boyali pushed a commit to boyali/autoware.universe that referenced this pull request Oct 19, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants