Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

revert(map_based_prediction): use different time horizon (#967) #1006

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 29, 2024

Conversation

soblin
Copy link
Contributor

@soblin soblin commented May 29, 2024

Description

this PR is not ready
#967

Related links

this PR is not ready
#967

Tests performed

this is revert

Notes for reviewers

Interface changes

none

Effects on system behavior

none

Pre-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below when creating the PR.

In-review checklist for the PR reviewers

The PR reviewers must check the checkboxes below before approval.

  • The PR follows the pull request guidelines.
  • The PR has been properly tested.
  • The PR has been reviewed by the code owners.

Post-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below before merging.

  • There are no open discussions or they are tracked via tickets.
  • The PR is ready for merge.

After all checkboxes are checked, anyone who has write access can merge the PR.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the component:map Map creation, storage, and loading. (auto-assigned) label May 29, 2024
@soblin soblin changed the title Revert "feat(map_based_prediction): use different time horizon (#967)" revert(map_based_prediction): use different time horizon (#967) May 29, 2024
@soblin soblin merged commit 83b9a97 into autowarefoundation:main May 29, 2024
11 checks passed
@soblin soblin deleted the revert/pr967 branch May 29, 2024 08:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
component:map Map creation, storage, and loading. (auto-assigned)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants