-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 170
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
zoneconcierge: enriching SubmissionData
to store BTCSpvProof
#239
Merged
Merged
Changes from 11 commits
Commits
Show all changes
18 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
61c0382
init
SebastianElvis 942d8dd
unit test
SebastianElvis fb878bd
fix tests and make proof optional
SebastianElvis 736c176
minor
SebastianElvis deb18ad
proof epoch sealed
SebastianElvis ad66c7c
sealer header
SebastianElvis b6435fd
make epoch interval to be at least 2
SebastianElvis 268c11c
Merge branch 'dev' into zoneconcierge-proof-epoch-sealed
SebastianElvis e11011c
init
SebastianElvis 164f98a
Merge branch 'dev' into btccheckpoint-store-btcspvproof
SebastianElvis ff7222b
fix ci
SebastianElvis a523315
fix comments
SebastianElvis 53264ab
Merge branch 'dev' into btccheckpoint-store-btcspvproof
SebastianElvis 7bcc556
fix comments and add unit tests
SebastianElvis 2a9ffa4
minor
SebastianElvis e17effd
replace submissiondata with txsinfo in api
SebastianElvis 608c44b
minor
SebastianElvis e82249d
minor
SebastianElvis File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There are two problems I see with sticking
BTCSpvProof
verbatim intoSubmissionData
.BTCSpvProof
is part of messageMsgInsertBTCSpvProof
) and between stuff we have already validated and saved into database. Now if we want to changeBTCSpvProof
due to some message requirements we will also modify it in db or if we want to optimize db layout due to performance we will touch message.In general we should have:
BTCSpvProof
are really not necessary (likeconfirming_btc_header
as this can be taken from btc light client, orbtc_transaction_index
as this is part of submission key).Solution to both problems is creating separate struct like
message TransactionInfo
which will hold all necessary transactions data necessary to prove its existence maybe like: