Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Moving to redsocks2 (w/shadowsocks)? #3193

Open
shaunco opened this issue Jul 17, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Moving to redsocks2 (w/shadowsocks)? #3193

shaunco opened this issue Jul 17, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@shaunco
Copy link

shaunco commented Jul 17, 2023

Looking through issues, there seem to be several related to redsocks, that are either still open or were closed without fixes, including:

redsocks has not been touched in 4 years. It really seems like time to move to redsocks2 (which now includes shadowsocks), which provides much more modern support for the original goal of CloudConnect making it through a proxy while also supporting IPv6, enhanced encryption, and more proxy types.

@shaunco shaunco changed the title Moving to redsocks2 / shadowsocks? Moving to redsocks2 (w/shadowsocks)? Jan 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant