-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allow module extensions to fail on a tag #17375
Labels
area-Bzlmod
Bzlmod-specific PRs, issues, and feature requests
P2
We'll consider working on this in future. (Assignee optional)
team-ExternalDeps
External dependency handling, remote repositiories, WORKSPACE file.
type: feature request
Comments
ShreeM01
added
type: feature request
team-ExternalDeps
External dependency handling, remote repositiories, WORKSPACE file.
untriaged
labels
Feb 1, 2023
Wyverald
added
P2
We'll consider working on this in future. (Assignee optional)
area-Bzlmod
Bzlmod-specific PRs, issues, and feature requests
and removed
untriaged
labels
Mar 9, 2023
copybara-service bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 17, 2023
This allows non-hermetic information (such as Starlark `Location`s) to be included in `fail` messages without allowing access to it from Starlark. It also aligns the content of `fail` output with that of `print`. This change has very mild implications for backwards compatibility: it only affects the contents of `fail` messages, which aren't accessible from Starlark; `debugPrint`'s default implementation is `str` and no built-in Starlark type overrides it; if a type overrides `debugPrint`, it would usually contain at least as detailed information as `str`; `debugPrint` is a "Bazelism" that isn't governed by the Starlark spec. Work towards #17375 Closes #18818. Co-authored-by: Alexandre Rostovtsev <[email protected]> PiperOrigin-RevId: 557916312 Change-Id: I8f202cd8530bcebb2d99f57745289b3992d03cac
bazel-io
pushed a commit
to bazel-io/bazel
that referenced
this issue
Aug 18, 2023
This allows non-hermetic information (such as Starlark `Location`s) to be included in `fail` messages without allowing access to it from Starlark. It also aligns the content of `fail` output with that of `print`. This change has very mild implications for backwards compatibility: it only affects the contents of `fail` messages, which aren't accessible from Starlark; `debugPrint`'s default implementation is `str` and no built-in Starlark type overrides it; if a type overrides `debugPrint`, it would usually contain at least as detailed information as `str`; `debugPrint` is a "Bazelism" that isn't governed by the Starlark spec. Work towards bazelbuild#17375 Closes bazelbuild#18818. Co-authored-by: Alexandre Rostovtsev <[email protected]> PiperOrigin-RevId: 557916312 Change-Id: I8f202cd8530bcebb2d99f57745289b3992d03cac
iancha1992
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Aug 18, 2023
This allows non-hermetic information (such as Starlark `Location`s) to be included in `fail` messages without allowing access to it from Starlark. It also aligns the content of `fail` output with that of `print`. This change has very mild implications for backwards compatibility: it only affects the contents of `fail` messages, which aren't accessible from Starlark; `debugPrint`'s default implementation is `str` and no built-in Starlark type overrides it; if a type overrides `debugPrint`, it would usually contain at least as detailed information as `str`; `debugPrint` is a "Bazelism" that isn't governed by the Starlark spec. Work towards #17375 Closes #18818. Co-authored-by: Alexandre Rostovtsev <[email protected]> Commit 3abbf20 PiperOrigin-RevId: 557916312 Change-Id: I8f202cd8530bcebb2d99f57745289b3992d03cac Co-authored-by: Fabian Meumertzheim <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Alexandre Rostovtsev <[email protected]>
@fmeum Is this already fixed? |
@meteorcloudy Yes, it was fixed in #19274. |
A fix for this issue has been included in Bazel 6.4.0 RC1. Please test out the release candidate and report any issues as soon as possible. Thanks! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
area-Bzlmod
Bzlmod-specific PRs, issues, and feature requests
P2
We'll consider working on this in future. (Assignee optional)
team-ExternalDeps
External dependency handling, remote repositiories, WORKSPACE file.
type: feature request
Description of the feature request:
Module extensions should be able to fail on a particular module extension tag so that the emitted stack trace points to the location at which the particular tag was created by the user.
What underlying problem are you trying to solve with this feature?
When a user specifies an invalid module extension tag in their
MODULE.bazel
file (e.g. a version of a dependency that isn't valid) and the module extensionsfail
s due to that, the stack trace starts with the module extension implementation function. There is no way to reference the particular tag that caused the failure, which makes it unnecessarily difficult for the user to fix the issue.Which operating system are you running Bazel on?
Any
What is the output of
bazel info release
?6.0.0
If
bazel info release
returnsdevelopment version
or(@non-git)
, tell us how you built Bazel.No response
What's the output of
git remote get-url origin; git rev-parse master; git rev-parse HEAD
?No response
Have you found anything relevant by searching the web?
No response
Any other information, logs, or outputs that you want to share?
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: