Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Release - June 2018 - name: 0.15.1 #5591

Closed
laurentlb opened this issue Jul 13, 2018 · 23 comments
Closed

Release - June 2018 - name: 0.15.1 #5591

laurentlb opened this issue Jul 13, 2018 · 23 comments
Assignees

Comments

@laurentlb
Copy link
Contributor

Path release on top of release 0.15.0 (#5057)

@laurentlb
Copy link
Contributor Author

laurentlb commented Jul 13, 2018

Need to cherry-pick 8ff87c1 (to fix #5468)

Anything else?

cc @buchgr

@ittaiz
Copy link
Member

ittaiz commented Jul 13, 2018 via email

@hlopko
Copy link
Member

hlopko commented Jul 13, 2018

Yes please, 539cdca and c25f7c8 for #5468

@hlopko
Copy link
Member

hlopko commented Jul 13, 2018

Sorry those are from the 0.16 release branch.

8ff87c1 and
c4622ac from the master branch.

@buchgr
Copy link
Contributor

buchgr commented Jul 13, 2018

please cherry-pick d3228b6

@laurentlb
Copy link
Contributor Author

Cherry-picked the 3 commits mentioned above.
https://releases.bazel.build/0.15.1/rc1/index.html

@iabraham
Copy link

Any timeline on when the patch to fix #5468 will make it to Homebrew?

@ittaiz
Copy link
Member

ittaiz commented Jul 16, 2018

@laurentlb @buchgr any info on this making it to Homebrew?

@laurentlb
Copy link
Contributor Author

I expect to release 0.15.1 later today.
Homebrew can be updated after that.

@ittaiz
Copy link
Member

ittaiz commented Jul 16, 2018

Oh, I thought it was released already. Thanks!
🤞

@laurentlb
Copy link
Contributor Author

(my comment from Friday was announcing a release candidate)

Bazel 0.15.1 is now released: https://github.com/bazelbuild/bazel/releases/tag/0.15.1

cc @ilovezfs @vbatts @petemounce

@vbatts
Copy link

vbatts commented Jul 16, 2018 via email

@ilovezfs
Copy link
Contributor

0.15.1 shipped in Homebrew: Homebrew/homebrew-core#30120

@petemounce
Copy link
Contributor

chocolatey 0.15.1 is also pushed.

@schroederc
Copy link
Contributor

Running bazel-0.15.1-linux-x86_64 gives me this error:

Extracting Bazel installation...
FATAL: Could not find system javabase. Ensure JAVA_HOME is set, or javac is on your PATH.

bazel-0.15.1-linux-x86_64 seems to now require either JAVA_HOME set or javac on the system's PATH where as bazel-0.15.0-linux-x86_64 did not. I'm assuming previous versions simply used the embedded JDK and now Bazel does not, but the release notes do not specify any such change.

@buchgr
Copy link
Contributor

buchgr commented Jul 17, 2018

@schroederc thanks for making us aware. in fact this binary was created without an embedded jdk. that's a bug. I am looking into it.

@ittaiz
Copy link
Member

ittaiz commented Jul 17, 2018 via email

@buchgr
Copy link
Contributor

buchgr commented Jul 17, 2018

@ittaiz yep!

We are currently releasing 0.15.2. Same cherry-picks, but built with the embedded jdk.

@laurentlb
Copy link
Contributor Author

I've released 0.15.2: https://github.com/bazelbuild/bazel/releases/tag/0.15.2
It is what 0.15.1 should have been (same set of cherrypicks; without the jdk issue).

Sorry for the issue.

cc @ilovezfs @vbatts @petemounce

@vbatts
Copy link

vbatts commented Jul 17, 2018 via email

@ilovezfs
Copy link
Contributor

0.15.2 shipped in Homebrew Homebrew/homebrew-core#30184

@ahedberg
Copy link

Hi folks - Chocolatey on Windows is suggesting 0.15.1 as the newest version, and Abseil started seeing the following error on its internal CI when it was used:

bazel clean
Extracting Bazel installation...
ERROR: Couldn't find java at 'C:\Program Files/bin/java.exe'.

We're pinning to 0.15.0 in the meantime. Sounds like 0.15.2 might fix this, but thought I'd mention it in case someone has contacts with Chocolatey.

@petemounce
Copy link
Contributor

I've just pushed 0.15.2 to chocolatey.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

10 participants