Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implement
GoodJob.cleanup_preserved_jobs
, fixes #351 #356Implement
GoodJob.cleanup_preserved_jobs
, fixes #351 #356Changes from 2 commits
23ff392
ad2c81b
daf8e83
d0ab3e1
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm curious if you think it would be good to have a better kwarg name here. I want to suggest something like
cleanup_preserved_jobs(before: 3.days.ago)
orcleanup_preserved_jobs(older_than: 3.days)
<-- I think I like this one.The longer option names were really a result of wanting the CLI interface to be clear given that there are limitations in what can be passed through
ENV
. But as a Ruby method, it's easy to pass in a timestamp, or duration.It's a kwarg so it's trivial to preserve both options, and there is a benefit to being symetrical with the CLI options, but I recognize it's a little clunky.
Not a blocker of this PR, I wanted to get your perspective :D
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Definitely!
When writing this, I was also considering
older_than
but wanted to stick with the CLI option name to avoid having to discuss a potential other name. So I'm very happy you brought it up!I don't think we necessarily need to keep both names, but I'm open to that. I'll work on the changes and you can have another look if you want to keep this symmetrical after all.