We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
This would provide useful shorthand in "function systems" when there are a lot of components. Something like:
#[derive(Bundle)] struct MyBundle { a: ComponentA, b: ComponentB } fn some_system(component_group: Bundle<MyBundle>) { println!("a: {:?}", component_group.a); println!("b: {:?}", component_group.b); }
Ideally it could be used alongside normal queries like (&MyComponent, Bundle<MyBundle>)
(&MyComponent, Bundle<MyBundle>)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Implemented in #798
Sorry, something went wrong.
Merge pull request bevyengine#9 from guimcaballero/update_to_0.5
a264008
Update to 0.5
Merge pull request bevyengine#9 from robtfm/patch-taa
81e9d29
Patch taa
Merge pull request bevyengine#9 from tigregalis/ct-no-mutex
e3731d2
Remove last mutex on font system
No branches or pull requests
This would provide useful shorthand in "function systems" when there are a lot of components. Something like:
Ideally it could be used alongside normal queries like
(&MyComponent, Bundle<MyBundle>)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: