Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Retain Rendering World (adopted) #15320

Merged
merged 95 commits into from
Sep 30, 2024

Conversation

Trashtalk217
Copy link
Contributor

@Trashtalk217 Trashtalk217 commented Sep 19, 2024

Migration Guide

The retained render world is a complex change: migrating might take one of a few different forms depending on the patterns you're using.

For every example, we specify in which world the code is run. Most of the changes affect render world code, so for the average Bevy user who's using Bevy's high-level rendering APIs, these changes are unlikely to affect your code.

Spawning entities in the render world

Previously, if you spawned an entity with world.spawn(...), commands.spawn(...) or some other method in the rendering world, it would be despawned at the end of each frame. In 0.15, this is no longer the case and so your old code could leak entities. This can be mitigated by either re-architecting your code to no longer continuously spawn entities (like you're used to in the main world), or by adding the bevy_render::world_sync::TemporaryRenderEntity component to the entity you're spawning. Entities tagged with TemporaryRenderEntity will be removed at the end of each frame (like before).

Extract components with ExtractComponentPlugin

// main world
app.add_plugins(ExtractComponentPlugin::<ComponentToExtract>::default());

ExtractComponentPlugin has been changed to only work with synced entities. Entities are automatically synced if ComponentToExtract is added to them. However, entities are not "unsynced" if any given ComponentToExtract is removed, because an entity may have multiple components to extract. This would cause the other components to no longer get extracted because the entity is not synced.

So be careful when only removing extracted components from entities in the render world, because it might leave an entity behind in the render world. The solution here is to avoid only removing extracted components and instead despawn the entire entity.

Manual extraction using Extract<Query<(Entity, ...)>>

// in render world, inspired by bevy_pbr/src/cluster/mod.rs
pub fn extract_clusters(
    mut commands: Commands,
    views: Extract<Query<(Entity, &Clusters, &Camera)>>,
) {
    for (entity, clusters, camera) in &views {
        // some code
        commands.get_or_spawn(entity).insert(...);
    }
}

One of the primary consequences of the retained rendering world is that there's no longer a one-to-one mapping from entity IDs in the main world to entity IDs in the render world. Unlike in Bevy 0.14, Entity 42 in the main world doesn't necessarily map to entity 42 in the render world.

Previous code which called get_or_spawn(main_world_entity) in the render world (Extract<Query<(Entity, ...)>> returns main world entities). Instead, you should use &RenderEntity and render_entity.id() to get the correct entity in the render world. Note that this entity does need to be synced first in order to have a RenderEntity.

When performing manual abstraction, this won't happen automatically (like with ExtractComponentPlugin) so add a SyncToRenderWorld marker component to the entities you want to extract.

This results in the following code:

// in render world, inspired by bevy_pbr/src/cluster/mod.rs
pub fn extract_clusters(
    mut commands: Commands,
    views: Extract<Query<(&RenderEntity, &Clusters, &Camera)>>,
) {
    for (render_entity, clusters, camera) in &views {
        // some code
        commands.get_or_spawn(render_entity.id()).insert(...);
    }
}

// in main world, when spawning
world.spawn(Clusters::default(), Camera::default(), SyncToRenderWorld)

Looking up Entity ids in the render world

As previously stated, there's now no correspondence between main world and render world Entity identifiers.

Querying for Entity in the render world will return the Entity id in the render world: query for MainEntity (and use its id() method) to get the corresponding entity in the main world.

This is also a good way to tell the difference between synced and unsynced entities in the render world, because unsynced entities won't have a MainEntity component.

@alice-i-cecile alice-i-cecile added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 30, 2024
Merged via the queue into bevyengine:main with commit 56f8e52 Sep 30, 2024
26 checks passed
@Trashtalk217
Copy link
Contributor Author

Last thank you to @re0312, I couldn't have done it without you.

github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 30, 2024
# Objective

Fixes #15367.

Currently, required components can only be defined through the `require`
macro attribute. While this should be used in most cases, there are also
several instances where you may want to define requirements at runtime,
commonly in plugins.

Example use cases:

- Require components only if the relevant optional plugins are enabled.
For example, a `SleepTimer` component (for physics) is only relevant if
the `SleepPlugin` is enabled.
- Third party crates can define their own requirements for first party
types. For example, "each `Handle<Mesh>` should require my custom
rendering data components". This also gets around the orphan rule.
- Generic plugins that add marker components based on the existence of
other components, like a generic `ColliderPlugin<C: AnyCollider>` that
wants to add a `ColliderMarker` component for all types of colliders.
- This is currently relevant for the retained render world in #15320.
The `ExtractComponentPlugin<C>` should add `SyncToRenderWorld` to all
components that should be extracted. This is currently done with
observers, which is more expensive than required components, and causes
archetype moves.
- Replace some built-in components with custom versions. For example, if
`GlobalTransform` required `Transform` through `TransformPlugin`, but we
wanted to use a `CustomTransform` type, we could replace
`TransformPlugin` with our own plugin. (This specific example isn't
good, but there are likely better use cases where this may be useful)

See #15367 for more in-depth reasoning.

## Solution

Add `register_required_components::<T, R>` and
`register_required_components_with::<T, R>` methods for `Default` and
custom constructors respectively. These methods exist on `App` and
`World`.

```rust
struct BirdPlugin;

impl Plugin for BirdPlugin {
    fn plugin(app: &mut App) {
        // Make `Bird` require `Wings` with a `Default` constructor.
        app.register_required_components::<Bird, Wings>();

        // Make `Wings` require `FlapSpeed` with a custom constructor.
        // Fun fact: Some hummingbirds can flutter their wings 80 times per second!
        app.register_required_components_with::<Wings, FlapSpeed>(|| FlapSpeed::from_duration(1.0 / 80.0));
    }
}
```

The custom constructor is a function pointer to match the `require` API,
though it could take a raw value too.

Requirement inheritance works similarly as with the `require` attribute.
If `Bird` required `FlapSpeed` directly, it would take precedence over
indirectly requiring it through `Wings`. The same logic applies to all
levels of the inheritance tree.

Note that registering the same component requirement more than once will
panic, similarly to trying to add multiple component hooks of the same
type to the same component. This avoids constructor conflicts and
confusing ordering issues.

### Implementation

Runtime requirements have two additional challenges in comparison to the
`require` attribute.

1. The `require` attribute uses recursion and macros with clever
ordering to populate hash maps of required components for each component
type. The expected semantics are that "more specific" requirements
override ones deeper in the inheritance tree. However, at runtime, there
is no representation of how "specific" each requirement is.
2. If you first register the requirement `X -> Y`, and later register `Y
-> Z`, then `X` should also indirectly require `Z`. However, `Y` itself
doesn't know that it is required by `X`, so it's not aware that it
should update the list of required components for `X`.

My solutions to these problems are:

1. Store the depth in the inheritance tree for each entry of a given
component's `RequiredComponents`. This is used to determine how
"specific" each requirement is. For `require`-based registration, these
depths are computed as part of the recursion.
2. Store and maintain a `required_by` list in each component's
`ComponentInfo`, next to `required_components`. For `require`-based
registration, these are also added after each registration, as part of
the recursion.

When calling `register_required_components`, it works as follows:

1. Get the required components of `Foo`, and check that `Bar` isn't
already a *direct* requirement.
3. Register `Bar` as a required component for `Foo`, and add `Foo` to
the `required_by` list for `Bar`.
4. Find and register all indirect requirements inherited from `Bar`,
adding `Foo` to the `required_by` list for each component.
5. Iterate through components that require `Foo`, registering the new
inherited requires for them as indirect requirements.

The runtime registration is likely slightly more expensive than the
`require` version, but it is a one-time cost, and quite negligible in
practice, unless projects have hundreds or thousands of runtime
requirements. I have not benchmarked this however.

This does also add a small amount of extra cost to the `require`
attribute for updating `required_by` lists, but I expect it to be very
minor.

## Testing

I added some tests that are copies of the `require` versions, as well as
some tests that are more specific to the runtime implementation. I might
add a few more tests though.

## Discussion

- Is `register_required_components` a good name? Originally I went for
`register_component_requirement` to be consistent with
`register_component_hooks`, but the general feature is often referred to
as "required components", which is why I changed it to
`register_required_components`.
- Should we *not* panic for duplicate requirements? If so, should they
just be ignored, or should the latest registration overwrite earlier
ones?
- If we do want to panic for duplicate, conflicting registrations,
should we at least not panic if the registrations are *exactly* the
same, i.e. same component and same constructor? The current
implementation panics for all duplicate direct registrations regardless
of the constructor.

## Next Steps

- Allow `register_required_components` to take a `Bundle` instead of a
single required component.
    - I could also try to do it in this PR if that would be preferable.
- Not directly related, but archetype invariants?
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 1, 2024
… world changes (#15578)

# Objective

Update the UI's texture slice extraction to work with the changes from
the retained render world PR (#15320).
robtfm pushed a commit to robtfm/bevy that referenced this pull request Oct 4, 2024
- Adopted from bevyengine#14449
- Still fixes bevyengine#12144.

## Migration Guide

The retained render world is a complex change: migrating might take one
of a few different forms depending on the patterns you're using.

For every example, we specify in which world the code is run. Most of
the changes affect render world code, so for the average Bevy user who's
using Bevy's high-level rendering APIs, these changes are unlikely to
affect your code.

### Spawning entities in the render world

Previously, if you spawned an entity with `world.spawn(...)`,
`commands.spawn(...)` or some other method in the rendering world, it
would be despawned at the end of each frame. In 0.15, this is no longer
the case and so your old code could leak entities. This can be mitigated
by either re-architecting your code to no longer continuously spawn
entities (like you're used to in the main world), or by adding the
`bevy_render::world_sync::TemporaryRenderEntity` component to the entity
you're spawning. Entities tagged with `TemporaryRenderEntity` will be
removed at the end of each frame (like before).

### Extract components with `ExtractComponentPlugin`

```
// main world
app.add_plugins(ExtractComponentPlugin::<ComponentToExtract>::default());
```

`ExtractComponentPlugin` has been changed to only work with synced
entities. Entities are automatically synced if `ComponentToExtract` is
added to them. However, entities are not "unsynced" if any given
`ComponentToExtract` is removed, because an entity may have multiple
components to extract. This would cause the other components to no
longer get extracted because the entity is not synced.

So be careful when only removing extracted components from entities in
the render world, because it might leave an entity behind in the render
world. The solution here is to avoid only removing extracted components
and instead despawn the entire entity.

### Manual extraction using `Extract<Query<(Entity, ...)>>`

```rust
// in render world, inspired by bevy_pbr/src/cluster/mod.rs
pub fn extract_clusters(
    mut commands: Commands,
    views: Extract<Query<(Entity, &Clusters, &Camera)>>,
) {
    for (entity, clusters, camera) in &views {
        // some code
        commands.get_or_spawn(entity).insert(...);
    }
}
```
One of the primary consequences of the retained rendering world is that
there's no longer a one-to-one mapping from entity IDs in the main world
to entity IDs in the render world. Unlike in Bevy 0.14, Entity 42 in the
main world doesn't necessarily map to entity 42 in the render world.

Previous code which called `get_or_spawn(main_world_entity)` in the
render world (`Extract<Query<(Entity, ...)>>` returns main world
entities). Instead, you should use `&RenderEntity` and
`render_entity.id()` to get the correct entity in the render world. Note
that this entity does need to be synced first in order to have a
`RenderEntity`.

When performing manual abstraction, this won't happen automatically
(like with `ExtractComponentPlugin`) so add a `SyncToRenderWorld` marker
component to the entities you want to extract.

This results in the following code:
```rust
// in render world, inspired by bevy_pbr/src/cluster/mod.rs
pub fn extract_clusters(
    mut commands: Commands,
    views: Extract<Query<(&RenderEntity, &Clusters, &Camera)>>,
) {
    for (render_entity, clusters, camera) in &views {
        // some code
        commands.get_or_spawn(render_entity.id()).insert(...);
    }
}

// in main world, when spawning
world.spawn(Clusters::default(), Camera::default(), SyncToRenderWorld)
```

### Looking up `Entity` ids in the render world

As previously stated, there's now no correspondence between main world
and render world `Entity` identifiers.

Querying for `Entity` in the render world will return the `Entity` id in
the render world: query for `MainEntity` (and use its `id()` method) to
get the corresponding entity in the main world.

This is also a good way to tell the difference between synced and
unsynced entities in the render world, because unsynced entities won't
have a `MainEntity` component.

---------

Co-authored-by: re0312 <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: re0312 <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Periwink <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Anselmo Sampietro <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Emerson Coskey <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Christian Hughes <[email protected]>
robtfm pushed a commit to robtfm/bevy that referenced this pull request Oct 4, 2024
# Objective

Fixes bevyengine#15367.

Currently, required components can only be defined through the `require`
macro attribute. While this should be used in most cases, there are also
several instances where you may want to define requirements at runtime,
commonly in plugins.

Example use cases:

- Require components only if the relevant optional plugins are enabled.
For example, a `SleepTimer` component (for physics) is only relevant if
the `SleepPlugin` is enabled.
- Third party crates can define their own requirements for first party
types. For example, "each `Handle<Mesh>` should require my custom
rendering data components". This also gets around the orphan rule.
- Generic plugins that add marker components based on the existence of
other components, like a generic `ColliderPlugin<C: AnyCollider>` that
wants to add a `ColliderMarker` component for all types of colliders.
- This is currently relevant for the retained render world in bevyengine#15320.
The `ExtractComponentPlugin<C>` should add `SyncToRenderWorld` to all
components that should be extracted. This is currently done with
observers, which is more expensive than required components, and causes
archetype moves.
- Replace some built-in components with custom versions. For example, if
`GlobalTransform` required `Transform` through `TransformPlugin`, but we
wanted to use a `CustomTransform` type, we could replace
`TransformPlugin` with our own plugin. (This specific example isn't
good, but there are likely better use cases where this may be useful)

See bevyengine#15367 for more in-depth reasoning.

## Solution

Add `register_required_components::<T, R>` and
`register_required_components_with::<T, R>` methods for `Default` and
custom constructors respectively. These methods exist on `App` and
`World`.

```rust
struct BirdPlugin;

impl Plugin for BirdPlugin {
    fn plugin(app: &mut App) {
        // Make `Bird` require `Wings` with a `Default` constructor.
        app.register_required_components::<Bird, Wings>();

        // Make `Wings` require `FlapSpeed` with a custom constructor.
        // Fun fact: Some hummingbirds can flutter their wings 80 times per second!
        app.register_required_components_with::<Wings, FlapSpeed>(|| FlapSpeed::from_duration(1.0 / 80.0));
    }
}
```

The custom constructor is a function pointer to match the `require` API,
though it could take a raw value too.

Requirement inheritance works similarly as with the `require` attribute.
If `Bird` required `FlapSpeed` directly, it would take precedence over
indirectly requiring it through `Wings`. The same logic applies to all
levels of the inheritance tree.

Note that registering the same component requirement more than once will
panic, similarly to trying to add multiple component hooks of the same
type to the same component. This avoids constructor conflicts and
confusing ordering issues.

### Implementation

Runtime requirements have two additional challenges in comparison to the
`require` attribute.

1. The `require` attribute uses recursion and macros with clever
ordering to populate hash maps of required components for each component
type. The expected semantics are that "more specific" requirements
override ones deeper in the inheritance tree. However, at runtime, there
is no representation of how "specific" each requirement is.
2. If you first register the requirement `X -> Y`, and later register `Y
-> Z`, then `X` should also indirectly require `Z`. However, `Y` itself
doesn't know that it is required by `X`, so it's not aware that it
should update the list of required components for `X`.

My solutions to these problems are:

1. Store the depth in the inheritance tree for each entry of a given
component's `RequiredComponents`. This is used to determine how
"specific" each requirement is. For `require`-based registration, these
depths are computed as part of the recursion.
2. Store and maintain a `required_by` list in each component's
`ComponentInfo`, next to `required_components`. For `require`-based
registration, these are also added after each registration, as part of
the recursion.

When calling `register_required_components`, it works as follows:

1. Get the required components of `Foo`, and check that `Bar` isn't
already a *direct* requirement.
3. Register `Bar` as a required component for `Foo`, and add `Foo` to
the `required_by` list for `Bar`.
4. Find and register all indirect requirements inherited from `Bar`,
adding `Foo` to the `required_by` list for each component.
5. Iterate through components that require `Foo`, registering the new
inherited requires for them as indirect requirements.

The runtime registration is likely slightly more expensive than the
`require` version, but it is a one-time cost, and quite negligible in
practice, unless projects have hundreds or thousands of runtime
requirements. I have not benchmarked this however.

This does also add a small amount of extra cost to the `require`
attribute for updating `required_by` lists, but I expect it to be very
minor.

## Testing

I added some tests that are copies of the `require` versions, as well as
some tests that are more specific to the runtime implementation. I might
add a few more tests though.

## Discussion

- Is `register_required_components` a good name? Originally I went for
`register_component_requirement` to be consistent with
`register_component_hooks`, but the general feature is often referred to
as "required components", which is why I changed it to
`register_required_components`.
- Should we *not* panic for duplicate requirements? If so, should they
just be ignored, or should the latest registration overwrite earlier
ones?
- If we do want to panic for duplicate, conflicting registrations,
should we at least not panic if the registrations are *exactly* the
same, i.e. same component and same constructor? The current
implementation panics for all duplicate direct registrations regardless
of the constructor.

## Next Steps

- Allow `register_required_components` to take a `Bundle` instead of a
single required component.
    - I could also try to do it in this PR if that would be preferable.
- Not directly related, but archetype invariants?
robtfm pushed a commit to robtfm/bevy that referenced this pull request Oct 4, 2024
… world changes (bevyengine#15578)

# Objective

Update the UI's texture slice extraction to work with the changes from
the retained render world PR (bevyengine#15320).
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 7, 2024
# Objective

After merging retained rendering world #15320, we now have a good way of
creating a link between worlds (*HIYAA intensifies*). This means that
`get_or_spawn` is no longer necessary for that function. Entity should
be opaque as the warning above `get_or_spawn` says. This is also part of
#15459.

I'm deprecating `get_or_spawn_batch` in a different PR in order to keep
the PR small in size.

## Solution

Deprecate `get_or_spawn` and replace it with `get_entity` in most
contexts. If it's possible to query `&RenderEntity`, then the entity is
synced and `render_entity.id()` is initialized in the render world.

## Migration Guide

If you are given an `Entity` and you want to do something with it, use
`Commands.entity(...)` or `World.entity(...)`. If instead you want to
spawn something use `Commands.spawn(...)` or `World.spawn(...)`. If you
are not sure if an entity exists, you can always use `get_entity` and
match on the `Option<...>` that is returned.

---------

Co-authored-by: Alice Cecile <[email protected]>
@alice-i-cecile alice-i-cecile changed the title The Cooler 'Retain Rendering World' Retain Rendering World (adopted) Oct 10, 2024
targrub pushed a commit to targrub/bevy that referenced this pull request Oct 10, 2024
# Objective

In the Render World, there are a number of collections that are derived
from Main World entities and are used to drive rendering. The most
notable are:
- `VisibleEntities`, which is generated in the `check_visibility` system
and contains visible entities for a view.
- `ExtractedInstances`, which maps entity ids to asset ids.

In the old model, these collections were trivially kept in sync -- any
extracted phase item could look itself up because the render entity id
was guaranteed to always match the corresponding main world id.

After bevyengine#15320, this became much more complicated, and was leading to a
number of subtle bugs in the Render World. The main rendering systems,
i.e. `queue_material_meshes` and `queue_material2d_meshes`, follow a
similar pattern:

```rust
for visible_entity in visible_entities.iter::<With<Mesh2d>>() {
    let Some(mesh_instance) = render_mesh_instances.get_mut(visible_entity) else {
        continue;
    };
            
    // Look some more stuff up and specialize the pipeline...
            
    let bin_key = Opaque2dBinKey {
        pipeline: pipeline_id,
        draw_function: draw_opaque_2d,
        asset_id: mesh_instance.mesh_asset_id.into(),
        material_bind_group_id: material_2d.get_bind_group_id().0,
    };
    opaque_phase.add(
        bin_key,
        *visible_entity,
        BinnedRenderPhaseType::mesh(mesh_instance.automatic_batching),
    );
}
```

In this case, `visible_entities` and `render_mesh_instances` are both
collections that are created and keyed by Main World entity ids, and so
this lookup happens to work by coincidence. However, there is a major
unintentional bug here: namely, because `visible_entities` is a
collection of Main World ids, the phase item being queued is created
with a Main World id rather than its correct Render World id.

This happens to not break mesh rendering because the render commands
used for drawing meshes do not access the `ItemQuery` parameter, but
demonstrates the confusion that is now possible: our UI phase items are
correctly being queued with Render World ids while our meshes aren't.

Additionally, this makes it very easy and error prone to use the wrong
entity id to look up things like assets. For example, if instead we
ignored visibility checks and queued our meshes via a query, we'd have
to be extra careful to use `&MainEntity` instead of the natural
`Entity`.

## Solution

Make all collections that are derived from Main World data use
`MainEntity` as their key, to ensure type safety and avoid accidentally
looking up data with the wrong entity id:

```rust
pub type MainEntityHashMap<V> = hashbrown::HashMap<MainEntity, V, EntityHash>;
```

Additionally, we make all `PhaseItem` be able to provide both their Main
and Render World ids, to allow render phase implementors maximum
flexibility as to what id should be used to look up data.

You can think of this like tracking at the type level whether something
in the Render World should use it's "primary key", i.e. entity id, or
needs to use a foreign key, i.e. `MainEntity`.

## Testing

##### TODO:

This will require extensive testing to make sure things didn't break!
Additionally, some extraction logic has become more complicated and
needs to be checked for regressions.

## Migration Guide

With the advent of the retained render world, collections that contain
references to `Entity` that are extracted into the render world have
been changed to contain `MainEntity` in order to prevent errors where a
render world entity id is used to look up an item by accident. Custom
rendering code may need to be changed to query for `&MainEntity` in
order to look up the correct item from such a collection. Additionally,
users who implement their own extraction logic for collections of main
world entity should strongly consider extracting into a different
collection that uses `MainEntity` as a key.

Additionally, render phases now require specifying both the `Entity` and
`MainEntity` for a given `PhaseItem`. Custom render phases should ensure
`MainEntity` is available when queuing a phase item.
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 13, 2024
…15745)

# Objective

#15320 is a particularly painful breaking change, and the new
`RenderEntity` in particular is very noisy, with a lot of `let entity =
entity.id()` spam.

## Solution

Implement `WorldQuery`, `QueryData` and `ReadOnlyQueryData` for
`RenderEntity` and `WorldEntity`.

These work the same as the `Entity` impls from a user-facing
perspective: they simply return an owned (copied) `Entity` identifier.
This dramatically reduces noise and eases migration.

Under the hood, these impls defer to the implementations for `&T` for
everything other than the "call .id() for the user" bit, as they involve
read-only access to component data. Doing it this way (as opposed to
implementing a custom fetch, as tried in the first commit) dramatically
reduces the maintenance risk of complex unsafe code outside of
`bevy_ecs`.

To make this easier (and encourage users to do this themselves!), I've
made `ReadFetch` and `WriteFetch` slightly more public: they're no
longer `doc(hidden)`. This is a good change, since trying to vendor the
logic is much worse than just deferring to the existing tested impls.

## Testing

I've run a handful of rendering examples (breakout, alien_cake_addict,
auto_exposure, fog_volumes, box_shadow) and nothing broke.

## Follow-up

We should lint for the uses of `&RenderEntity` and `&MainEntity` in
queries: this is just less nice for no reason.

---------

Co-authored-by: Trashtalk217 <[email protected]>
@alice-i-cecile
Copy link
Member

I'll tackle the release notes for this. I think that getting something in place for this ASAP is important to help communicate these changes to the rendering devs and ease initial migration during the release candidate.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-ECS Entities, components, systems, and events A-Rendering Drawing game state to the screen D-Complex Quite challenging from either a design or technical perspective. Ask for help! M-Needs-Migration-Guide A breaking change to Bevy's public API that needs to be noted in a migration guide M-Needs-Release-Note Work that should be called out in the blog due to impact S-Ready-For-Final-Review This PR has been approved by the community. It's ready for a maintainer to consider merging it X-Blessed Has a large architectural impact or tradeoffs, but the design has been endorsed by decision makers
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Render world blocking certain ecs developments
7 participants