Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Merged by Bors] - bevy_reflect: Fix misplaced impls #6829

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

MrGVSV
Copy link
Member

@MrGVSV MrGVSV commented Dec 3, 2022

Objective

Followup to this comment

Rearrange the impls in the impls/std.rs file.

The issue was that I had accidentally misplaced the impl for Option<T> and put it between the Cow<'static, str> impls. This is just a slight annoyance and readability issue.

Solution

Move the Option<T> and &'static Path impls around to be more readable.

@MrGVSV MrGVSV added C-Code-Quality A section of code that is hard to understand or change A-Reflection Runtime information about types labels Dec 3, 2022
Copy link
Member

@alice-i-cecile alice-i-cecile left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Merging as trivial :) I'll defer to you on the organization.

bors r+

bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2022
# Objective

> Followup to [this](#6755 (comment)) comment

Rearrange the impls in the `impls/std.rs` file.

The issue was that I had accidentally misplaced the impl for `Option<T>` and put it between the `Cow<'static, str>` impls. This is just a slight annoyance and readability issue.

## Solution

Move the `Option<T>` and `&'static Path` impls around to be more readable.
@alice-i-cecile alice-i-cecile added the S-Ready-For-Final-Review This PR has been approved by the community. It's ready for a maintainer to consider merging it label Dec 3, 2022
@bors bors bot changed the title bevy_reflect: Fix misplaced impls [Merged by Bors] - bevy_reflect: Fix misplaced impls Dec 3, 2022
@bors bors bot closed this Dec 3, 2022
feyokorenhof added a commit to feyokorenhof/bevy that referenced this pull request Dec 4, 2022
feyokorenhof added a commit to feyokorenhof/bevy that referenced this pull request Dec 4, 2022
	 pick 440faacc solved merge conflict with bevyengine#6829
@james7132 james7132 added this to the 0.10 milestone Dec 6, 2022
ickshonpe pushed a commit to ickshonpe/bevy that referenced this pull request Dec 6, 2022
# Objective

> Followup to [this](bevyengine#6755 (comment)) comment

Rearrange the impls in the `impls/std.rs` file.

The issue was that I had accidentally misplaced the impl for `Option<T>` and put it between the `Cow<'static, str>` impls. This is just a slight annoyance and readability issue.

## Solution

Move the `Option<T>` and `&'static Path` impls around to be more readable.
alradish pushed a commit to alradish/bevy that referenced this pull request Jan 22, 2023
# Objective

> Followup to [this](bevyengine#6755 (comment)) comment

Rearrange the impls in the `impls/std.rs` file.

The issue was that I had accidentally misplaced the impl for `Option<T>` and put it between the `Cow<'static, str>` impls. This is just a slight annoyance and readability issue.

## Solution

Move the `Option<T>` and `&'static Path` impls around to be more readable.
ItsDoot pushed a commit to ItsDoot/bevy that referenced this pull request Feb 1, 2023
# Objective

> Followup to [this](bevyengine#6755 (comment)) comment

Rearrange the impls in the `impls/std.rs` file.

The issue was that I had accidentally misplaced the impl for `Option<T>` and put it between the `Cow<'static, str>` impls. This is just a slight annoyance and readability issue.

## Solution

Move the `Option<T>` and `&'static Path` impls around to be more readable.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-Reflection Runtime information about types C-Code-Quality A section of code that is hard to understand or change S-Ready-For-Final-Review This PR has been approved by the community. It's ready for a maintainer to consider merging it
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants