Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consider refactoring license, cost, accessibility #154

Closed
hansioan opened this issue Nov 19, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed

Consider refactoring license, cost, accessibility #154

hansioan opened this issue Nov 19, 2019 · 3 comments
Assignees
@joncison
Labels
bug done - staged for release enhancement
Milestone
3.2.0

Comments

@hansioan
Copy link
Member

@matuskalas says these can be reduced and made clearer. Let's discuss here @joncison @hmenager
@joncison
Copy link
Member

joncison commented Nov 20, 2019 •
edited
Loading

I propose:

  • leave the definition of cost as it is - I don't see what's wrong with it.
  • remove from accessibility the terms Proprietary and Freeware which conflate with license (see below) and confuse the meaning of accessibility quite badly. If we did this, accessibility simply becomes a choice between Open access and Restricted access (applicable to online services only) which is very clear
  • leave License as it is. There is Proprietary, Unlicensed and Other but I think they all serve a purpose. PS. we've used "Unlicensed" quite a lot where we searched for a license, but one does not exist.

cc @hansioan @matuskalas @hmenager

@joncison joncison added this to the 3.2.0 milestone Nov 20, 2019
@joncison
Copy link
Member

joncison commented Nov 21, 2019 •
edited
Loading

Done in 3.2.0:

  • removed from accessibility the terms Proprietary and Freeware
  • added Freeware to License (to go alongside Proprietary which is already there

and updated the definitions

joncison added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 21, 2019
@joncison
Addresses #173, #172, #163, #160, #154, #151,
164fc1f
@joncison joncison self-assigned this Nov 25, 2019
@joncison
Copy link
Member

NB: cardinality set to 0 or 1 (was 0 to many) given there's now a choice between two mutually exclusive things.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@joncison joncison

Labels
bug done - staged for release enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
3.2.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@joncison @hansioan