-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 64
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[WIP] Macro nodes #196
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
[WIP] Macro nodes #196
Conversation
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #196 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 76.62% 76.83% +0.21%
==========================================
Files 99 106 +7
Lines 21155 22667 +1512
==========================================
+ Hits 16209 17416 +1207
- Misses 4946 5251 +305 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
6f658e1
to
344440a
Compare
345116f
to
9ab70c6
Compare
056b9b8
to
19b6da5
Compare
df82f89
to
4d832d8
Compare
4d832d8
to
5083b2d
Compare
5083b2d
to
ec02c53
Compare
@ales-erjavec, this is a very nice addition, can't wait to be available in the released version - my colleagues build brutally large workflows sometimes. One thing to keep in mind could be to limit the depth of levels a user can create so that it doesn't get out of hand like LabView. :) |
ec02c53
to
d9892ab
Compare
d9892ab
to
4bfecc1
Compare
4bfecc1
to
459dc1e
Compare
ef2d0a4
to
f3f3f3e
Compare
f3f3f3e
to
aaf2a49
Compare
Due to deprecated nodes/links/annotations properties
Does not conform to standard guidelines, wastes space and the implementation is ugly.
Issue
Need macro node support
Changes
Add macro node functionality - hierarchical sub-workflows.