Add test for wps_multiple_outputs #60
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@huard I have never really checked to return complex inputs as data in the response document in pywps. It should return each output either as reference or as data (as requested in the execute request): |
|
@huard do you like to open an issue on pywps? |
|
Yes, I will. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Overview
I think this exposes a potential bug in pywps. If we set as_reference to False for both outputs in the multiple_output process, only "reference" is sent back as data, while "output" is still transferred as a reference. Is this expected or the server should force the data to be included in the response ?
Also, the content is in CDATA format with escape characters. Again, not sure if this is expected or not.