-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 203
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Check old TODO entries #1311
Comments
Let me confess that I have just sent a PR with new TODO comments during my "code review" to document undocumented code parts ;-) Normally I would treat code with TODO comments as a reason to reject a PR... |
You're forgiven this one time ;) |
🤣 I don't have problems with that. This PR here is not about in-code TODO comments but just about a single TODO file in the repo itself. |
Dear @Germar , do you have an idea what this point is about? |
Filesystems always store the uid and gid for a file. Not the user/groupname. uid/gid are enumerate by the time of creating each user/group. So if you have an old machine with user foo=uid1000 and user bar=uid1001 and you build a new machine but this time you create user bar first, you'll end up with user foo=uid1001 and user bar=uid1000. If you now restore your files (with BiT root) foo can't access his files but all the files from bar... |
Thanks for explaining. So this TODO entry could be treated as a feature request. Am I right so far? |
Covered by issue #489
Covered by issue #1434.
|
I found a
TODO
file in the repo which last commit was 6 years ago. That was the content:We need to check this points if they are still relevant.
Tag: Meta, Discussion
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: