Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Missing include on algorithm #213

Open
Eddie-cz opened this issue Jul 19, 2021 · 3 comments
Open

Missing include on algorithm #213

Eddie-cz opened this issue Jul 19, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@Eddie-cz
Copy link
Contributor

Eddie-cz commented Jul 19, 2021 •
edited
Loading

Error: boost/process/detail/traits/wchar_t.hpp(150,14): error : no member named 'transform' in namespace 'std'
Fix: include <algorithm> in wchar_t.hpp
Version: Boost 1.77 beta 1
@Eddie-cz
Copy link
Contributor Author

Eddie-cz commented Aug 1, 2021

Is there anybody who is dealing with issues like this? For an year, I manually patch 036c9fc, because it's still not in boost release. This lib is starting to be kinda annoying.

@klemens-morgenstern
Copy link
Collaborator

Sorry this fell of my radar. If you create a PR, I'll just merge it.

@Eddie-cz
Copy link
Contributor Author

Eddie-cz commented Aug 2, 2021

PR #215

@Stardusstt Stardusstt mentioned this issue Sep 28, 2021
Closed
@martyngigg martyngigg mentioned this issue May 7, 2022
Merged
jens-diewald added a commit to jens-diewald/boost-wintls that referenced this issue Aug 22, 2022
@jens-diewald
Add include as workaround for Boost 1.77
52c16e2 
Boost.Process misses an algorithm include in Boost 1.77,
see boostorg/process#213.
laudrup pushed a commit to laudrup/boost-wintls that referenced this issue Oct 6, 2022
@jens-diewald @laudrup
Add include as workaround for Boost 1.77
b1a5716 
Boost.Process misses an algorithm include in Boost 1.77,
see boostorg/process#213.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@klemens-morgenstern @Eddie-cz