You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Suggested by @cwhelan in #722, hard filtering in the Scramble is performed in GatherSampleEvidence, which may not be desirable for some users. While users can tune filtering cutoffs when running calling, they cannot do so post hoc. Lowering the default threshold fed to Scramble and then filtering with a higher threshold when creating the VCF would at least permit sensitivity analysis from the table output without having to re-run the tool.
Note that one drawback to loosening filtering criteria is that it may substantially increase wall time, as consensus sequence alignment is expensive.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Suggested by @cwhelan in #722, hard filtering in the Scramble is performed in GatherSampleEvidence, which may not be desirable for some users. While users can tune filtering cutoffs when running calling, they cannot do so post hoc. Lowering the default threshold fed to Scramble and then filtering with a higher threshold when creating the VCF would at least permit sensitivity analysis from the table output without having to re-run the tool.
Note that one drawback to loosening filtering criteria is that it may substantially increase wall time, as consensus sequence alignment is expensive.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: