Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issues with [email protected] on OSX #106

Closed
hughsk opened this issue Nov 3, 2014 · 25 comments
Closed

Issues with [email protected] on OSX #106

hughsk opened this issue Nov 3, 2014 · 25 comments

Comments

@hughsk
Copy link
Member

hughsk commented Nov 3, 2014

Which I believe can be attributed to the recent bump of chokidar to ^0.10.5. For a reproducible case, try installing [email protected] and compare it to the now fixed [email protected].

The change was generating a lot of log output, and while on my machine it was running it was causing page loads to hang indefinitely on my friend's machine. Sample output: https://gist.github.com/cabbibo/617f20241fe876453a88

This is more of an issue relevant to chokidar, but just a heads up considering that this change came in as a patch update – it would probably be worth reverting, and then publishing with a minor or major bump when the issue is resolved.

Thanks!

@mattdesl
Copy link
Contributor

mattdesl commented Nov 3, 2014

Just started hitting this today.

@mafintosh
Copy link
Collaborator

Yes I guess we should revert this then. /cc @es128

@es128
Copy link
Contributor

es128 commented Nov 4, 2014

cc @pipobscure

The errors are actually coming out of the fsevents module, but this is the first time I've seen it look like that. Nonetheless, @hughsk I'd appreciate if you could try installing my fork of fsevents at https://github.com/es128/fsevents to see if the issue goes away with it. If so, I may publish my fork to npm and switch chokidar to it while I'm waiting for the last change to be reviewed/published by @pipobscure.

@es128
Copy link
Contributor

es128 commented Nov 4, 2014

FWIW I could not reproduce the issue using [email protected] on OS X 10.9.5

@builtbylane
Copy link

I'm having a similar issue with 2.1.1 on OSX when watchifying a heavy load of seperate bundles
error:
gulp[15135] (FSEvents.framework) FSEventStreamStart: register_with_server: ERROR: f2d_register_rpc() => (null) (-21)

when I was on 2.1.0 I would get this error:

(node) warning: possible EventEmitter memory leak detected. 11 listeners added. Use emitter.setMaxListeners() to increase limit.
Trace
    at StatWatcher.addListener (events.js:160:15)
    at Object.fs.watchFile (fs.js:1174:8)
    at EventEmitter.FSWatcher._watch (node_modules/watchify/node_modules/chokidar/index.js:240:8)
    at EventEmitter.FSWatcher._handleFile (node_modules/watchify/node_modules/chokidar/index.js:280:8)
    at node_modules/watchify/node_modules/chokidar/index.js:356:33
    at Object.oncomplete (fs.js:107:15)

gulp + bundler config

https://gist.github.com/builtbylane/921b2df18b224ba27467

@es128
Copy link
Contributor

es128 commented Nov 6, 2014

Ok now I've been able to reproduce the issue with webgl-workshop 1.0.4 on both Yosemite and Mavericks. It doesn't happen until you click a link in the UI.

Seems to have something to do with the amount of simultaneous fsevents watchers being opened - so it only impacts specific use-cases.

Starting to explore ways to mitigate the problem.

es128 added a commit to paulmillr/chokidar that referenced this issue Nov 6, 2014
@es128
Copy link
Contributor

es128 commented Nov 6, 2014

Should be mostly resolved with chokidar 0.10.5

@builtbylane
Copy link

Not seeing any difference on my end with chokidar 0.10.5

@es128
Copy link
Contributor

es128 commented Nov 10, 2014

Are you running more than one instance of watchify simultaneously by any chance? The fix prevents a single process instance from exceeding the system limit of fsevents listeners.

Do you have the same problem if you run [email protected]?

Another change that could be made would be to expose chokidar's usePolling option so users can enable it in through watchify options if they run into this problem at the expense of heavier CPU load.

@builtbylane
Copy link

I'm running 20+ instances of watchify.

Don't know enough about node to understand what the other changes you are proposing mean

@es128
Copy link
Contributor

es128 commented Nov 10, 2014

@builtbylane If you hack the source of watchify in your node_modules (or make a fork) to change the lines that looks like var w = chokidar.watch(file, {persistent: true}); to var w = chokidar.watch(file, {persistent: true, usePolling: true});, the errors should go away and your CPU utilization will increase.

I was suggesting that watchify should expose an option to allow users to set this when needed without resorting to such a hacky workaround.

@builtbylane
Copy link

thanks @es128 for taking the time.

I change this option but now I get another error (the same I was getting in earlier versions of watchify)

Trace
    at StatWatcher.addListener (events.js:160:15)
    at Object.fs.watchFile (fs.js:1174:8)
    at EventEmitter.FSWatcher._watch (node_modules/watchify/node_modules/chokidar/index.js:346:8)
    at EventEmitter.FSWatcher._handleFile (node_modules/watchify/node_modules/chokidar/index.js:380:8)
    at EventEmitter.<anonymous> (node_modules/watchify/node_modules/chokidar/index.js:484:14)
    at Object.oncomplete (fs.js:107:15)
(node) warning: possible EventEmitter memory leak detected. 11 listeners added. Use emitter.setMaxListeners() to increase limit.

@es128
Copy link
Contributor

es128 commented Nov 10, 2014

Are you watching the same files with your 20+ instances of watchify? Perhaps you are triggering a lot of redundant watching that you could consolidate.

As a quick workaround, I suppose you could try something like var w = chokidar.watch(file, {persistent: true, usePolling: true}).setMaxListeners(30);

@es128
Copy link
Contributor

es128 commented Nov 10, 2014

Actually it isn't chainable like that, so it would be w.setMaxListeners(30) on the next line... but I'm kind of doubting it's going to work anyway since that isn't the emitter that's complaining.

@builtbylane
Copy link

I tried adjusting max listeners to no avail. sure there's some redundant watching down the chain, but at the top level, there's 20+ js files for 20+ different site sections or so, with about 30-50 modules that they share. I don't just get that error once btw. get about 30 of them and there's definitely a memory leak.

On one level this seems like an issue with node itself? nodejs/node-v0.x-archive#5463

On another, do you or anyone else out there have any recommended strategies for handling this situation?

@es128
Copy link
Contributor

es128 commented Nov 11, 2014

The suggestion would be to set one watcher over the file tree you need watched and execute actions conditionally based on the path of the changed file.

Can you share a repo that represents your project well enough to make the error reproducible?

@builtbylane
Copy link

You rock! I'm creating a repo now, I'll invite you in a few.

@es128
Copy link
Contributor

es128 commented Nov 11, 2014

The issue @builtbylane has been observing did come down to running two separate gulp processes which use watchify simultaneously, bypassing the chokidar 0.10.5 fix since it involves system-wide limits, and I haven't found a way to automatically detect when the limit has been reached (because the FSEventStreamStart errors are not catch-able).

I'm not sure how common this sort of usage is, or whether it's more of an edge-case situation.

If https://github.com/pipobscure/fsevents/issues/42 got resolved, a much more elegant solution would be possible.

@scamden
Copy link

scamden commented Nov 11, 2014

@es128 i have a single gulp process that uses three watchify bundles and am seeing this error. just thought I'd add that signal in terms of how come the usage is

@es128
Copy link
Contributor

es128 commented Nov 11, 2014

The error shouldn't occur within one process, even with separate watchify bundles, unless there are other fsevents watchers active on the system taking substantially from the overall limit. Again, it's very unfortunate that there doesn't seem to be a way to detect that. The limit within a single node process using chokidar is currently set to 400, while the system-wide limit is apparently 450.

@es128
Copy link
Contributor

es128 commented Nov 12, 2014

I just released chokidar 0.10.6 which further addresses this issue by reusing watcher instances, despite watchify asking for a separate one for each file.

In the @builtbylane use-case, it drops the number of fsevents watchers created from hundreds to just one, and on webgl-workshop there ends up being around 100 after loading every section of the workshop (originally there were thousands).

@hughsk @mattdesl @builtbylane @scamden Please try it out and let us know if you're still experiencing any problems.

@builtbylane
Copy link

FIXED!!! @es128 you are a hero 🍤 🍤 🍤

@scamden
Copy link

scamden commented Nov 13, 2014

@es128 i'm so grateful. fixed my issue. you are the man

@es128
Copy link
Contributor

es128 commented Nov 13, 2014

Happy to help.

@mafintosh @substack I think this issue can be closed.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Nov 13, 2014

Thanks for the fix upstream! Closing.

This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants