Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add unit tests on ARM #1125

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 22, 2021
Merged

Add unit tests on ARM #1125

merged 2 commits into from
Jun 22, 2021

Conversation

twometresteve
Copy link
Contributor

Goal

Adds unit tests on ARM Macs to CI and placeholder steps for the e2e tests.

Design

Although tested, the e2e tests cannot be enabled at this stage due to the screen lock in place. This will be reviewed in time.

Changeset

To avoid conflicts in uploaded file names, I've changed the pipeline to upload Intel/ARM apps as different names. This was easier than changing the rest of the framework to run off of variable app names.

Testing

Covered by CI. Skipped e2e test steps were successfully tested during development by manually logging into the server whilst running.

@github-actions
Copy link

Infer: No issues found 🎉

OCLint: No issues found 🎉

Bugsnag.framework binary size did not change - 1,128,680 bytes

Generated by 🚫 Danger

@twometresteve twometresteve changed the title Tms/m1 Add unit tests on ARM Jun 21, 2021
skip: Pending PLAT-6822
depends_on:
- cocoa_fixture
timeout_in_minutes: 10
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This will need to be changed to 60 when skip: is removed

Copy link
Contributor

@nickdowell nickdowell left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM - may I suggest a squash merge to tidy up the history? 🙃

@twometresteve
Copy link
Contributor Author

LGTM - may I suggest a squash merge to tidy up the history? 🙃

Yes, that's a fair point in this case.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants