Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Bump bugsnag-android to v5.23.0 #143

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 22, 2022
Merged

Bump bugsnag-android to v5.23.0 #143

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 22, 2022

Conversation

tomlongridge
Copy link
Contributor

Goal

Bump bugsnag-android dependency to v5.23.0

Note - this includes a new configuration option that needs to be added to the Unity codebase.

Enhancements

  • Added configuration option to control whether internal errors are sent to Bugsnag
    #1701

Bug fixes

  • Fixed Bugsnag interactions with the Google ANR handler on newer versions of Android
    #1699
  • Overwriting & clearing event metadata in the NDK plugin will no longer leave phantom values
    #1700
  • Improved app.inForeground reporting for NDK errors
    #1690
  • Fixed concurrency bug that could be triggered via the React Native plugin
    #1679
  • Correctly report device.locationStatus on Android 12 onwards using LocationManager.isLocationEnabled
    1683
  • Fixed NDK stack-traces for libraries linked after Bugsnag.start was called
    #1671

lemnik
lemnik approved these changes Jun 22, 2022
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@lemnik lemnik left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@tomlongridge tomlongridge merged commit 0a6f3d9 into next Jun 22, 2022
@tomlongridge tomlongridge deleted the android-5230 branch June 22, 2022 09:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@lemnik lemnik lemnik approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@tomlongridge @lemnik