Plots: should we list Clinical Attributes as a Profile Type to simplify the interface?

[jjgao]

We could

• remove the two radio boxes to select Molecular Profile or Clinical Attribute
• Move Profile Type to the first one
• Add Clinical data into the Profile Type drop-down
• Move Gene selection to the last one

Just a thought. Comments? @schultzn @tmazor @adamabeshouse

Current one:

[adamabeshouse]

Makes perfect sense to me

[schultzn]

That might work… so gene selection would move down to the last step?

…

On Jul 3, 2018, at 6:36 PM, Adam Abeshouse ***@***.***> wrote: Makes perfect sense to me — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#4432 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALV34AhI0OYBIEmvfOL44qlt6yIYcYJUks5uC_HXgaJpZM4VBmdp>.

[jjgao]

@schultzn yes.

@adamabeshouse could you give it a try? Maybe in a separate branch/pr in case we will revert it.

[pieterlukasse]

@jjgao sounds good. One thought: maybe rename "Profile type" to something more generic like "Data type"? "Clinical data" is not something I would look for in a "Profile type" drop down.

[jjgao]

@pieterlukasse I was thinking of that too, but should we also change Profile Name?