Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
i think issue is
golang/go#30310 (comment)

i was able to reproduce on my machine using go releaser dry run, and
adding this build flag fixed it.

apparently its some glibc issue, what a surprise! :)

Co-authored-by: a <[email protected]>
  • Loading branch information
2 people authored and calmbeing committed Apr 24, 2023
1 parent b6bd62d commit a93cd8d
Showing 1 changed file with 5 additions and 5 deletions.
10 changes: 5 additions & 5 deletions .goreleaser.yml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ builds:
env:
- CC=o64-clang
- CXX=o64-clang++
tags: [ nosqlite, noboltdb ]
tags: [ nosqlite, noboltdb, netgo ]
ldflags: -s -w

- id: darwin-arm64
Expand All @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ builds:
env:
- CC=oa64-clang
- CXX=oa64-clang++
tags: [ nosqlite, noboltdb ]
tags: [ nosqlite, noboltdb, netgo ]
ldflags: -s -w

- id: linux-amd64
Expand All @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ builds:
env:
- CC=x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc
- CXX=x86_64-linux-gnu-g++
tags: [ nosqlite, noboltdb ]
tags: [ nosqlite, noboltdb, netgo ]
ldflags: -s -w -extldflags "-static" # We need to build a static binary because we are building in a glibc based system and running in a musl container

- id: linux-arm64
Expand All @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ builds:
env:
- CC=aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc
- CXX=aarch64-linux-gnu-g++
tags: [ nosqlite, noboltdb ]
tags: [ nosqlite, noboltdb, netgo ]
ldflags: -s -w -extldflags "-static" # We need to build a static binary because we are building in a glibc based system and running in a musl container

- id: windows-amd64
Expand All @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ builds:
env:
- CC=x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc
- CXX=x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++
tags: [ nosqlite, noboltdb ]
tags: [ nosqlite, noboltdb, netgo ]
ldflags: -s -w


Expand Down

0 comments on commit a93cd8d

Please sign in to comment.