Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: use juju 3.4/stable instead of 3.5/stable #521

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 2, 2024
Merged

Conversation

DnPlas
Copy link
Contributor

@DnPlas DnPlas commented Jun 21, 2024

@DnPlas DnPlas requested a review from a team as a code owner June 21, 2024 16:10
Copy link
Contributor

@orfeas-k orfeas-k left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's merge after the cos issue is fixed and we rerun

@DnPlas
Copy link
Contributor Author

DnPlas commented Jun 27, 2024

Looks like this PR's CI is affected by canonical/envoy-operator#114.

@DnPlas DnPlas merged commit 1adef28 into main Jul 2, 2024
51 checks passed
@DnPlas DnPlas deleted the KF-5892-use-juju-3.4 branch July 2, 2024 13:35
mvlassis pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 9, 2024
* ci: use juju 3.4/stable instead of 3.5/stable

Part of canonical/bundle-kubeflow#944
mvlassis pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 9, 2024
* ci: use juju 3.4/stable instead of 3.5/stable

Part of canonical/bundle-kubeflow#944
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants