Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a scheduled workflow to run TICS #498

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 12, 2024
Merged

Conversation

daniloegea
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

I found out that this #496 is not really required. TICS will not use -Wconversion by default.

Checklist

  • Runs make check successfully.
  • Retains 100% code coverage (make check-coverage).
  • New/changed keys in YAML format are documented.
  • (Optional) Adds example YAML for new feature.
  • (Optional) Closes an open bug in Launchpad.

The TIOBE analyzer will ingest it to process coverage data.
Copy link
Collaborator

@slyon slyon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, lgtm! I left some tiny, non-blocking comments in-line. Feel free to merge anyways.

meson.build Show resolved Hide resolved
run: |
export TICSAUTHTOKEN=${{ secrets.TICSAUTHTOKEN }}
source ~/.profile
TICSQServer -project netplan -branchname master -calc ALL -tmpdir /tmp/tics -branchdir . # wokeignore:rule=master
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

question (non-blocking): How is success/failure reported here? Is there any kind of threshold that we aim for?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's not reported. I can investigate that next. It will just update the data in the tiobe account for now.

.github/workflows/tiobe.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@daniloegea daniloegea merged commit 7c9d49d into canonical:main Aug 12, 2024
16 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants