Fix anniversary event #91
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent update brings enhancements across the application, focusing on refining user experience and data handling. It introduces a new method for calculating age differences, updates localization for anniversaries with pluralization, and improves the logic within the celebrations feature. Additionally, the Xcode project settings have been adjusted, including versioning and app category configuration. This cohesive set of changes aims to polish the app’s functionality and user interaction. Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review Status
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (5)
- ios/Runner.xcodeproj/project.pbxproj (6 hunks)
- lib/data/core/extensions/date_time.dart (1 hunks)
- lib/data/l10n/app_en.arb (2 hunks)
- lib/ui/shared/events/bloc/celebrations_bloc.dart (2 hunks)
- test/unit_test/shared/events/celebration_event_bloc_test.dart (5 hunks)
Additional Context Used
Additional comments not posted (7)
lib/data/core/extensions/date_time.dart (1)
28-34: ThecalculateDifferenceInYearsmethod introduces a nuanced approach to calculating the difference in years between two dates, considering the month and whether the current date is within the same week. However, there are a couple of points to consider:
- Leap Year Handling: Ensure that the calculation accurately accounts for leap years, especially when the dates span over February 29th.
- Week Calculation Logic: The use of
isDateInCurrentWeekfor adjusting the year difference might not be clear without additional context. Consider adding a comment explaining why this adjustment is necessary, especially in scenarios where the current date's week might affect the year difference calculation.lib/ui/shared/events/bloc/celebrations_bloc.dart (1)
44-53: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [37-50]
When creating birthday and anniversary events, consider refactoring this logic into separate methods for clarity and maintainability. This would make the
_fetchEventmethod more concise and improve the readability of the code.test/unit_test/shared/events/celebration_event_bloc_test.dart (1)
36-57: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [26-54]
The adjustments to the
dateOfJoiningand the creation of newEventinstances align with the changes in theCelebrationsBloc. To ensure comprehensive test coverage, consider adding tests that cover edge cases, particularly around date calculations and leap years.Would you like me to help draft some additional test cases to cover these scenarios?
lib/data/l10n/app_en.arb (1)
276-284: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [279-293]
The updates to
upcoming_anniversary_textandpresent_anniversary_textto support pluralization are well-implemented and enhance the application's localization. Ensure that all parts of the application that display anniversary messages utilize these updated entries for consistency and accuracy.ios/Runner.xcodeproj/project.pbxproj (3)
40-40: The update to the file type forPrivacyInfo.xcprivacytotext.xmlis appropriate for XML content.
417-417: The updates toCURRENT_PROJECT_VERSIONto2andMARKETING_VERSIONto1.0.2follow standard iOS app versioning practices.Also applies to: 428-428
422-422: The addition ofINFOPLIST_KEY_LSApplicationCategoryTypewith the value"public.app-category.utilities"is necessary for App Store categorization and aligns with the app's intended category.Also applies to: 560-560, 594-594
| @@ -33,8 +33,8 @@ class CelebrationsBloc extends Bloc<CelebrationEvent, CelebrationsState> { | |||
| final List<Employee> allEmployees = await _employeeService.getEmployees(); | |||
| employees = allEmployees | |||
| .where((employee) => employee.status == EmployeeStatus.active) | |||
| .where((employee) => employee.status == EmployeeStatus.active). | |||
| map((e) { | |||
| .where((employee) => employee.status == EmployeeStatus.active) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The filtering condition to check if an employee is active appears twice consecutively, which seems redundant. Consider removing one of the duplicate conditions to streamline the code.
- .where((employee) => employee.status == EmployeeStatus.active)Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| .where((employee) => employee.status == EmployeeStatus.active) |
Purpose
Summary of Changes
Test steps
Conformity
Visual Evidence (Video, Images or Gif)
Summary by CodeRabbit