Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding reservation for Crypto2099 On-Chain Voting #80

Closed

Conversation

Crypto2099
Copy link
Collaborator

Updated PR to use new registry.json format

@crptmppt
Copy link
Contributor

crptmppt commented Jun 8, 2021

this might be outdated- is it still valid and can you rebase for merge? (is this in use now?)

@crptmppt
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @Crypto2099

6/8 Editors meeting (24) discussed this PR - see notes.

=> is this implemented somewhere, or has this PR grown stale? Thanks for following up!

@crptmppt crptmppt added Update Adds content or significantly reworks an existing proposal State: Likely Deprecated Close if confirmed deprecated (or long waiting). labels Sep 17, 2021
@crptmppt crptmppt closed this Sep 21, 2021
rphair added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 30, 2024
* CIP meeting 80 updates

* adding #625 inter-meeting by undisputed request

* accidentally promoted as CIP instead of CPS
Ryun1 pushed a commit to Ryun1/CIPs that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2024
…foundation#750)

* CIP meeting 80 updates

* adding cardano-foundation#625 inter-meeting by undisputed request

* accidentally promoted as CIP instead of CPS
Ryun1 pushed a commit to Ryun1/CIPs that referenced this pull request Mar 6, 2024
…foundation#750)

* CIP meeting 80 updates

* adding cardano-foundation#625 inter-meeting by undisputed request

* accidentally promoted as CIP instead of CPS
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
State: Likely Deprecated Close if confirmed deprecated (or long waiting). Update Adds content or significantly reworks an existing proposal
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants