Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(get-started): updating cardano-node requirements #462

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 14, 2022

Conversation

mmahut
Copy link
Contributor

@mmahut mmahut commented Jan 4, 2022

Updating documentation

Updating the minimal requirements for cardano-node, they have changed since the last edit.

https://github.com/input-output-hk/cardano-node/releases/tag/1.32.1

Copy link
Member

@katomm katomm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@rdlrt
Copy link
Collaborator

rdlrt commented Jan 4, 2022

minimal requirements for cardano-node

Is that accurate? Those requirements should be for mainnet - we can run node with other networks on much smaller instances (hence, the note after the lines being edited).

Having said that, what we have now isnt "minimum requirement" either. The IO documentation does not differentiate between component requirements and network

@os11k
Copy link
Collaborator

os11k commented Jan 5, 2022

I tend to agree with @rdlrt , I do run pool in testnet with 8GB with no problem at all, so this will be misleading to put 12GB there.

@katomm
Copy link
Member

katomm commented Jan 12, 2022

Could we agree on minimum requirements for different networks? like @rdlrt suggested. I think that would be brilliant.

Network CPU Cores* RAM Storage
Testnet 2 4GB 10GB
Staging 2 4GB 10GB
Mainnet 2 12GB 30GB

*An Intel or AMD x86 processor with two or more cores, at 1.6GHz or faster (2GHz or faster for a stake pool or relay)

@katomm katomm merged commit 1479577 into staging Jan 14, 2022
@katomm katomm deleted the mmahut/cardano-node branch January 14, 2022 11:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants