Rework 'Get Started: Cardano Components'

[KtorZ]

Somehow, the presentation of the Cardano components felt completely
off. Most 'components' presented in this section were actually just
builder tools promoted as "core components". Truth is, they're not,
they are merely builder tools that happened to be developed by the
same company also developping core components.

When it comes to Cardano's architecture and core components, we can
roughly divide it in 4: settlement, consensus, networking and
scripting − despite consensus and networking being heavily
intertwined.

Hence, I've reworded the components section to reflect that, and moved
all builder tools where they belong. Flagging the cardano-cli as
favorite since it is a must to learn to use. Interestingly enough,
I couldn't find any good "Getting Started" source for the cardano-cli,
walking people through basic usage and commands that this tool
provides. There are various guides and tutorials that make use of the
command-line but I have yet seen any that really offers an
introduction the the cli itself. Something to write?

[rdlrt]

LGTM, agree with all - except maybe reconsideration for having bech32 as a builder 'tool' (I dont have too strong feeling with/against - happy with as-is too)

[katomm]

👍👍

[rphair]

I'm OK having bech32 listed as a builder tool. When I began as an SPO I'd seen those addresses but had no idea about the system behind it... so I believe it will be helpful for newcomers to have an emphatic reference to it when they are still at the browsing stage.

[thenic95]

Shouldn't we add new builder tools to the bottom of the existing list?

[rphair]

@thenic95:

Shouldn't we add new builder tools to the bottom of the existing list?

Since none of these tools are new, doesn't it make the most sense for them to appear early in the list, if not the beginning (since these tools have been around since the beginning)?

[KtorZ]

The list is rendered in alphabetical order anyway. So where we add stuff matters not.

[katomm]

The list is rendered in alphabetical order anyway. So where we add stuff matters not.

I'd say because it can be rendered in different ways (like alphabetical), we should add projects to the end. This would allow us other views like proposed in #740

[rphair]

OK @katomm that's a good idea in general, and we're OK to merge this one specifically without needing to put new items at the end because none of these tools are new.